Lydia_K@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 2 years agoIt's cannon.startrek.websiteimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1336arrow-down112
arrow-up1324arrow-down1imageIt's cannon.startrek.websiteLydia_K@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareHerbal Gamer@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·2 years agoThat explains the facial folds.
minus-squareSpendrill@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoAnd also why mother Klingons carry their young by gripping the loose skin on the back of their necks… no wait, I’m confusing Klingons with something else, aren’t I?
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoNot canon, but there was a fan theory that the changes occurred after the tribbles were transported aboard the Klingon ship in TOS.
minus-squarehessianerd@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoThey retconned the TOS Klingons in Enterprise https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affliction_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)
That explains the facial folds.
And also why mother Klingons carry their young by gripping the loose skin on the back of their necks… no wait, I’m confusing Klingons with something else, aren’t I?
Not canon, but there was a fan theory that the changes occurred after the tribbles were transported aboard the Klingon ship in TOS.
They retconned the TOS Klingons in Enterprise
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affliction_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)
TIL
Thanks