Link

What’s the US gonna do? Slink away in the middle of the night again?

  • nohaybanda [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    Which is its own kind of pathetic. Imagine running a simulation and you’ve not covered basic things like “causality” and “maximum parameter value means you can’t go above that number”.

    • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve noted 40k has a rules commentary that has statements like that, and I know some gamer somewhere has had that conversation.

      I know I’ve seen “it doesn’t say anywhere that a model removed from play can’t act” in the wild, which I feel like is pushing the limits of semantic readability of game rules.

      • GinAndJuche@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I know I’ve seen “it doesn’t say anywhere that a model removed from play can’t act” in the wild,

        Amazing

        • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          I read a story on 40konline back in the day where someone placed a character on top of another model and then moved the other (much faster) model around. It’s pretty wild what shit people will pull.

          If I’m doing tabletop rules writing, I try to be clear without getting trapped in the weeds of arguing with that sort of player. :/