EnderMB@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoAmazon's Silent Sackingjustingarrison.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1293arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1285arrow-down1external-linkAmazon's Silent Sackingjustingarrison.comEnderMB@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square46fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarevexikron@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down22·11 months agoCool, at least they recognize they are building their own personal wealth off of the suffering and exploitation of less well off people all around the world, sound like wonderful, moral people to me.
minus-squarekofe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·11 months agoHey, whatcha typing this comment on?
minus-squarevexikron@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down7·11 months agoLemme guess, anyone who uses any kind of technological device to post on lemmy is using something likely built in a sweatshop? So thus because no one is without sin, its not possible to be a morally better person than anyone else?
minus-squarekofe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·11 months agoThe first yes, but the second is a straw man of my argument. I’m curious if you can steel man it
minus-squarevexikron@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·11 months agoWell you have to put the two together to make what I figured your argument was, so I apparently do not understand your argument.
Cool, at least they recognize they are building their own personal wealth off of the suffering and exploitation of less well off people all around the world, sound like wonderful, moral people to me.
Hey, whatcha typing this comment on?
Lemme guess, anyone who uses any kind of technological device to post on lemmy is using something likely built in a sweatshop?
So thus because no one is without sin, its not possible to be a morally better person than anyone else?
The first yes, but the second is a straw man of my argument. I’m curious if you can steel man it
Well you have to put the two together to make what I figured your argument was, so I apparently do not understand your argument.