• 0 Posts
  • 1.6K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 16th, 2024

help-circle

  • Not OP, but my position has always been the constitutional position of “a well regulated militia”. Like imo you shouldn’t be able to have guns in your home, but it would be fine if there was a single gun locker on literally every block where you could store an entire personally-owned arsenal, as long as the locker met strict security rules and the gun users met strict and recurring training requirements.



  • Yeah we all go through a stage where we haven’t mentally matured yet and have this tween-like rebellion reaction to any idea about changing for the better. Some grow out of it at a younger age, some at a normal age, and some not at all. I remember a bunch of examples I’ve seen happen through the decades;

    “You say i shouldn’t eat meat, well i say nuh uh! Now I’m gonna eat twice as much!”

    “You say i shouldn’t smoke cigarettes, well i say nuh uh! Now I’m gonna smoke cigars too!”

    “You say i shouldn’t be racist, well i say nuh uh! Now I’m gonna be even more outrageously racist!”

    It’s just a non-thinking reactionary response to the idea that you aren’t perfect.


  • Abortion - till i was about 14 i had thought it should be illegal, but then i grew up a little bit more and realized the topic wasn’t like it was being presented at all. The truth is that in many cases an abortion is the best outcome for all parties involved, including the fetus, the person who’s pregnant, and all of the rest of us in the world.

    And when you start thinking about how to build a system in charge of differentiating which pregnancies should be aborted vs which should be carried to term it immediately becomes clear that if anyone besides the pregnant woman gets to decide then it becomes a literal waking nightmare of horror movie scenarios.

    In any non-juvenile view it’s obvious that abortion has to be legal, easily available, and entirely up to the pregnant woman to decide on


  • Checks and balances in the US government would stop a president from doing anything truly egregious. Unfortunately that belief has been proven very very incorrect

    (There was always the regular corruption and killing that the US was doing, but that was the “regular” accepted type of horribleness built into our system. But i truly thought the checks and balances would prevent the occurrence of extremely out of the ordinary radically new nakedly illegal tyrant style horrors.)