I’m not from the UK, but I’ve been trying to understand more about UK politics because of the election and I’ve seen headlines saying the Starmer has been pushing the Labour party to the center. What does that mean in terms of policies he’s said he will push? Also, now that they have won an overwhelming majority, do you think the party will actually use this opportunity to push the UK more left?

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The previous head, Jeremy Corbyn, was socialist and had a long history of fighting for socialist causes. It would have been hard for Labour to find a leader more socialist than him amongst their MP’s.

    Corbyn was also at the helm of a horrible Labour defeat in 2019.

    Starmer has been compared to Blair, for better or worse. Given the Labour party’s platform, I expect a lot of the energy of this government will be to fix the damage that the Tories caused, get some new clean energy, and try to grow the economy as some former Warsaw Pact countries are creeping up to the UK’s average wage.

    • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Corbyn was also at the helm of a horrible Labour defeat in 2019.

      Corbyn lost by less than 3 million votes (E: in spite of a brutal years-long smear campaign literally designating him “unelectable”). A “horrible defeat” is the narrative the neoliberal media wants you to follow because it makes him seems like less of a threat to the establishment than he really was.

      E: it’s a bit late and I doubt anyone will see this now, but after seeing it just mentioned on tv I had to add that Starmer won with about a third of the votes, while Corbyn lost with just under half. So no matter how the media or those who believe it try to twist things, and as if there’s really any doubt when you look at the reactions to each, but obviously it has to be said - Corbyn was demonstrably more popular than Starmer is.

        • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Absolutely, in case anyone needed more proof that the guy is 100% dedicated to the establishment and furthering his own career, not working class, and definitely not otherwise marginalised people (sadly, many do, so spreading this kind of info far and wide is not only welcome, but necessary).

      • Contravariant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        If UK politicians had any sense they’d fix the voting system that let that happen.

        Obviously they won’t because that same system put them in power and is currently holding far-right at bay, but it would be nice.

        • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Obviously they won’t because that same system put them in power

          Yes

          and is currently holding far-right at bay

          No, they’re acting as an establishment backed placeholder while the right regroups in preparation for a surge even further right next elections (when they get to blame all of the countries problems on “lefties”). Also the far right has made pretty significant gains this election.

          Either way though you’re right - he has no reason to fix the voting system. People really need to let this sink in - Starmer isn’t there for the good of the country or the people, but his own and that of the establishment.

        • Meron35@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          People think that the Brexit Referendum was when the UK timeline split, but imo it split when the Alternative Vote referendum failed back in 2011.

          • Contravariant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Keep in mind that for the way UK elects MPs something like Alternative Vote (or even approval voting, which I prefer) would only help with the problem that only 2 parties have any chance of winning in each particular constituency.

            It doesn’t get around the issue that ‘% of constituencies where party X wins the election’ and ‘% of votes cast for party X’ are in no way the same thing.

    • Foni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      What you say is better than what the Tories did, but with such a large majority they could seize the opportunity and renationalise some privatized services, improve and adequately finance those that the right was letting die, change the tax system so that the upper classes help to finance the state. You already know, things that should be normal on the left until the “third way”

      Like op, I’m not British and I wonder if this would be possible or do we forget that something like this is going to happen, I don’t know, if you’re from there, tell us.

      • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        They could, but aren’t going to.

        So far they have u-turned on every pledge they’ve made, specifically those about nationalising services, saving the health and social services from complete destruction from underfunding and privatisation, and stopping further cuts to a cruel benefits system they have no intention of addressing.

        Meanwhile taxing the rich more wasn’t even in their pledges, all they talk about is making Britain “better for business” and making the population less “work shy”.

        Anyone pinning any hope for significant change on Starmer’s blue Labour, hasn’t been paying any attention (or is out enough of direct harms way to not give a shit about those of us already at the bottom who will continue getting pounded).

        • Foni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thanks for the info, I wasn’t paying attention, but because British politics doesn’t affect me of course, I’m sorry for what it does.

          • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            If you’re not from here, my issue isn’t with you, people aren’t obliged to know the politics of all countries (though wherever you are, something similar is likely happening - the Overton window is shifting to the right globally), it’s the masses of locals who buy in to the idea that Starmer is a leftist that I find frustrating…

            • Foni@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yes, I understand you, in my country it has not yet taken hold in a drastic way, but you see how politicians with ideas, social democrats at most, are treated in the press like ultra-intractable radical leftists.