The company wants to charge for API access. Its volunteer moderators have other ideas

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cost gets spread out, but not completely. You are also going to run into problems if an instance takes off.

    The costs are manageable now, but is that sustainable?

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well I think it depends on the balance of growth between nodes and users. If growth of users and growth of instances is proportional, it should be sustainable.

      That leaves the question of how well Fediverse software can deal with increasing node numbers. I hope that engineering question has been properly considered. It’s like the available number of IP addresses when they initially designed TCP/IP, they never considered four octets might not be enough for future growth.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing on the Internet seems to indicate that use distribution will be even. Power law is going to get involved and some nodes are going to get massive.

        • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well yeah that will happen. Initially I looked for instances with the biggest subscription base. Then after some reading about the Fediverse I realized that kind of thinking does not apply. You get everything regardless of which node you’re on (barring any defederation). Maybe most will realize that, but you’re probably right most will not. We’ll see how it goes.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The hosting costs isn’t on the user end, but the instance end.