Amoxtli to Conservative@lemm.ee · 5 months agoTexas approves Bible-infused curriculum for public schoolswww.keranews.orgexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down113
arrow-up1-5arrow-down1external-linkTexas approves Bible-infused curriculum for public schoolswww.keranews.orgAmoxtli to Conservative@lemm.ee · 5 months agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squarerealcaseyrollinslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·5 months ago Schools aren’t required to use Bluebonnet Learning, but the state will offer financial incentives to districts that do. Nah get outta here with that. This violates the principle of separation of church and state.
minus-squareSeanBrently@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoBut the constitution only says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof… Nobody is making any law to establish any religion nor prohibit any. So I don’t think your arguement applies here.
minus-squarerealcaseyrollinslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoI never said it violated the Constitution.
minus-squareSeanBrently@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-24 months agoHmm so you didn’t. Perhaps it does tho, cuz check this out: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/374/203.html no state law or school board may require that passages from the Bible be read Although I don’t know if judges care about precedent anymore.
Nah get outta here with that. This violates the principle of separation of church and state.
But the constitution only says:
Nobody is making any law to establish any religion nor prohibit any. So I don’t think your arguement applies here.
I never said it violated the Constitution.
Hmm so you didn’t. Perhaps it does tho, cuz check this out: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/374/203.html
Although I don’t know if judges care about precedent anymore.
SCOTUS sure doesn’t.