• DJDarren
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who’s never used Linux, TIL that software doesn’t work across all flavours of Linux.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well it does technically, the issue we’re talking about is how it’s packaged, one you extract the package the software will work just the same (assuming there aren’t any version mismatches between kernel modules). DEBs (Debian based distros) and RPMs (RedHat based distros) are the two biggest package formats, the next common format is a tar ball.

      • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Add to this, this gives birth to more modern packaging format like flatpak, appimage, and snap, that works across all distro with proper permission control.

        Now for most graphical apps, you just search on the app store and click install, like a iphone user.

        • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t mention the S-word here, some people might come out of their basement to tell you how it’s the worst thing since proprietary software.

          • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think you might be talking about two group of Linux user. I think majority of the user realized that shared dependency is not scalable in the recent couple years, yet there are still a loud minority that oppose dupilicated dependencies that exists in these universal formats.

            Finally, I think the three universal package formats provide better sandboxing support than msi. But appx in windows are very much inline with these packaging formats.

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              shared dependency is not scalable

              Explain yourself.

              a loud minority

              Kernel develipers, libraries developers, compiler developers, distro maintainers, mirrors hosters, anyone whose system runs not on few terabytes disk and gigabit internet.

              I heard some geniuses put entire graphical drivers into snap/flatpak/appimages.

              • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Correct me if I am wrong.

                Different app depends on different version of the underlying softwares. In the old days distro packages apps, however it would cause dependency hell.

                Hence with the development in containers, universal packaging format prevails, where each app is packaged with all of its dependencies. so that the system dont need to maintain the dependency of every single app people want to use.

                • uis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Different app depends on different version of the underlying softwares.

                  On different ranges of versions. Usually something like “1.2 or newer”. With few exceptions that break ABI every year(looking at you, Boost) or 11 times a month(it is rust, who would have guessed). If everything was as hard as you described, then there is no way for me to play UT2004 back from, you guessed it, 2004. But I did, and all I needed just to install few 32-bit version of libraries and run it with OSS(very old audio api) emulation.

                  however it would cause dependency hell.

                  No, task of package manager is to solve dependency hell

                  universal packaging format

                  We had 2 universal packaging formats, now we have 5 universal packaging formats and two container types.

                  where each app is packaged with all of its dependencies.

                  Which in case of UT2004 means packaged with all exploits back from 2004.

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Iphone is most locked-down anti-consumer pile of garbage and this is how you defend it?

              • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are different aspect to the same product. IPhone is lockeddown and aniconsumer, but it doesn’t mean every aspect of it is not worth taking a lesson from.

                In order for linux to have mass apeal, it will need to be simple by default, and that is where the app store model shines, you just search and click install, everyone can figure that out.

                But that doesn’t imply linux has to be lockdown and anticonsumer like iphone. If you want to compile your own kernel, you should have freedom to do so.

                • uis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  and that is where the app store model shines, you just search and click install, everyone can figure that out.

                  This is how linux works for last 30 years…

                  • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Except now you dont need to worry about outdated software even on a super stable base. You get proper permission control and a mispackaged app cannot break the entire system.

    • moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The software itself should run, but the installers themselves use different standards. I’m pretty sure you could set up your own distro to use installers from different one, though it may require some work.

    • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Windows kind of has that too, with all the .MSI, .exe, .msix and all the appxpackages and how almost none of that works out of the box anymore because you’d otherwise be able to install another browser without opening edge once

      • DJDarren
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a Mac user, so they made it as simple as possible for our simple brains. That said, no old 32bit Steam games for me ☹️

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, Valve sucks with the “we’re not rewriting this for 64 bit because there’s no benefit” stance. It’s a pain in the ass to use on Linux because you have to have the 32 bit counterpart of everything it uses alongside the 64 bit counterpart that literally everything else uses. You would think they would finally decide to rewrite it since they’re a major Linux contributor, and their handheld runs Linux.

          • DJDarren
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fortunately, using a neat tool called Whisky, I’m able to install the Windows Steam client, from which I can download and play the Portal games, because they’re proper. But that’s M1/2 only.

            • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Since you mentioned you’ve never used Linux, you may find it amusing that similar windows compatibility software exists for Linux and is called Wine. Whisky and Wine.

              • DJDarren
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, Wine is a thing on Mac too. Never really dug too far into it though. Whisky is easy to use though.

            • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nice, a lot of the games work out of the box with the Linux client, you just need to enable support for unsupported games for Proton on the Steam settings.

        • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          last time I used Mac, I still need to go online and grab the dmg file (or whatever the extension of the file is) myself, since most app is not avaliable in the app store, like jetbrains app and adobe apps.

          Is it still the case?

          • DJDarren
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, that’s most often the case. I very rarely install from the App Store unless the software I’m after has a link on their site.