• bdonvrA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    If these are the only two options in our current system

    1.) god help us

    2.) let’s tear down the system

    • Grayox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unless class conciousness forms in America tearing the system down would result in a mad max hell scape and probably the end of of the human race because of the acceleration to climate change.

      • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If anything climate change would decelerate from the collapse of the system though. I mean, you saw that air quality, pollution indexes, etc have all improved during the lockdowns right? There’s a reason pollution is used to measure how the economy is doing in countries that aren’t honest about it (where usually less emissions = worse economy)

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        They don’t care. The Great Satan would be dead. That’s all that matters to them.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t need to throw out the whole system. Even just ranked choice voting and getting rid of the electoral college would massively improve the quality of our representation.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s the only two options in the system because the American people are not as left-wing as your average fucking Lemmy user.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Even as someone far more right than the average lemmy user, an 80 year old and an almost 80 year old being the only two options is absurd.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes, really. Fuck’s sake. What, you think Trump is using his entire net worth of negative 500 million to bribe a massive group of actors sworn to secrecy and change all the GOP primary outcomes in his favor?

              • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                No. I wasn’t even referring to primaries.

                But it’s not a system propped up by the voters when the system is specifically designed to favor two options and make voting a third option hard or undesirable despite said third option being better representative of your values.

                I hardly doubt a majority of people would like eother Biden or Trump, they just vote the one who they don’t want to lose to the other.

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  What third option is better representative of the majority or even a plurality of the views of the American people?

                  • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Having more than 2 parties in itself is more representative.

                    Believe it or not in healthy democracies no party represents more than half the population and governments are formed via coalitions, that’s because people are very diverse in opinions and beliefs and you can’t group them all in one or two parties.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah. God help us. But tearing down the system, while temporarily satisfying as millions die, will not be the solution we want it to be. What emerges will have the exact same problem as long as it is democratic and the American electorate is not changed.