Companies like Eli Lilly, Merck, GSK, Bristol-Meyers Squibb cause and perpetuate massive amounts of human suffering. I view them on the same level as Raytheon and Lockheed Martin. Input?

  • Rx_Hawk [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yeah, I get that, but these advancements don’t happen because the pharmaceutical industry exists, they happen despite it. The exact same people could be developing these treatments while working for the government.

    • itappearsthat@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sure, but we’re comparing private sector companies to private sector companies. MIC would also still be evil even if entirely nationalized.

      • Rx_Hawk [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That’s fair, but it would at least take part of the incentive for wars and destabilizing the world away.

        Would you consider the Chinese military companies to not be evil just because they work under the state? I get that they have to defend themselves, power projection is necessary, etc.

        I feel like weapons of war are inherently morally bad, or at least neutral if used for the right reasons. Providing medical care, on the other hand, is an inherently good thing that we have twisted for profit… Which could be an argument against me haha. Apples and oranges, I guess.