Lyft and Uber say they will leave Minneapolis if the mayor signs a minimum wage bill for drivers::Lyft and Uber threatened to stop doing business in Minneapolis after the city council adopted a new rule Thursday that would set a minimum wage for rideshare drivers.

    • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What assets? All they have is debt and maybe some servers. I guess the app and brand has some value, but only to another ride share company.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have corporate employees beyond the drivers. They likely have offices and such.

        • HobbitFoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They likely rent, so the most you are getting is a fee.

      • SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If we’re talking total fantasyland, I suppose put those employees to work building a government backed alternative or an open platform to allow smaller companies?

        Suppose you had a centralized federated system where states or municipalities or even companies could have their own drivers but it’s a common app?

        Edit to add you could also have both driver and passenger rate each other and allow both to filter by rating, lower ratings would naturally pay more or less to compensate for the service. I bet in cities you’d have luxury versions of the same services all from the same app, but also cheap shitty services too.

        • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The existence of Uber and Lyft does not prevent the government from doing this. If we are paying people to build and maintain this process we may as well hire people to do so. Taking over Uber would lead to the best employees leaving for other tech companies.

          • SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you’re underestimating how many people want to work for the government for the perceived benefits. I’m saying they have the stuff already set up, in fantasyland it would be a fairly smooth transition.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t own the cars, they don’t hire employees. We’d be left with an app? Some servers? We don’t need that stuff to run a decent public transportation service.

    • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Better off seizing taxis and the cars they own, but ultimately, why would we do that? Pass legislation to make them comply