• GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is it a “major win for the Constitution and the separation of powers” when the judicial branch acts unilaterally to dismantle the executive branch?

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      6 people who weren’t elected, have lifetime appointments, and take massive bribes from billionaires are getting rid of an agency that was created by the elected president to enforce rules and regulations that protect workers’ rights written by elected members of congress.

      The judicial system is the check and balance for the billionaires who might be affected by law changes brought by the general public voting.

    • AmoxtliOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      You don’t like the Constitution, figures…

      • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I mean, the founding fathers intended for it to be the groundwork for a living document, hence the codified procedure for amending it, and the amendments. But our legislative branch has gotten so dysfunctional that the idea of passing an amendment is laughable, and so it has become frozen in time. So, no. Not really, I don’t think it represents the needs of our country.