Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoPerspectiveslrpnk.netimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down16cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.15Karrow-down1imagePerspectiveslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareRolivers@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up59arrow-down1·3 months agoAlso the civilized world.
minus-squareℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down1·3 months agoSome countries use YYYY MM DD which is also sane.
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 months agoYYYY-MM-DD is the only sane format.
minus-squaredatelmd5sum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months ago%s is cool as well in my opinion.
minus-squareCarl@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoI prefer writing it out as DD MM YYYY, but i like my computer to sort everything by YYYY MM DD.
minus-squareKaryoplasma@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9·3 months agoYYYY-MM-DD is the ISO standard for that exact reason. It sorts chronologically without having to implement a custom comparator, regular string comparison is enough.
Also the civilized world.
Some countries use YYYY MM DD which is also sane.
YYYY-MM-DD is the only sane format.
%s is cool as well in my opinion.
I prefer writing it out as DD MM YYYY, but i like my computer to sort everything by YYYY MM DD.
YYYY-MM-DD is the ISO standard for that exact reason. It sorts chronologically without having to implement a custom comparator, regular string comparison is enough.