• Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lincoln was a conservative himself. He described himself as a conservative and historians Label him as one. In the speech you cited, he was speaking as a conservative to other conservatives.

    Democrats owned slaves. Democrats still want to own slaves.

    • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ending slavery is not a conservative position by definition. Conservatism means continuing the system that is currently in place and accepted.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ending slavery is a conservative value. Since we believe all men are equal, slavery by default insults that position.

        • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Are you sure you’re a conservative? Most conservative views are insulting. But back in real life, it was a deeply ingrained institution at the time.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I am very conservative. The Republican party was started to end slavery. Lincoln was a conservative. Before joining the Republican Party he was conservative Whig. Republicans have always stood up for freedom and individual rights. In the 80’s we picked up the religious right which skewed some stances but I’m not part of the religious right.

            • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t think there’s much use in explaining this, but you don’t seem to have a very good grasp of history. Party names are not the key to ideology, and it’s baffling that people think they can compare politics from 180 and 120 years ago using current concepts. If you think modern Republicans are the party of Lincoln, let’s see… who would we see flying Confederate flags currently?

                • Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Good.point.

                  This is the same reason I don’t trust any Italians from Rome. Those Romans are always going around waging wars of conquest, demanding tributes, look what they did to Carthage! I still hold them dang Romans responsible for all those crucifixions. Horrible!

                  And don’t even get me started on those Hittites! Constantly conquering people, they had slaves too! Just as bad as the democrats if not worse. Whenever I meet an Assyrian I like to personally thank them for taking care of those Hittite bastards.

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Weird, I never knew Rome was a political party. I always thought it was a city.

                • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Kind of a weird dodge… I’ll just answer the rhetorical question for you. So, people who currently fly confederate flags are uniformly Republican and identify as conservative.