Why politicians should not own stocks

  • hibsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are you the only one in here who bothered to look? I saw your comment and decided to look, too, and unless I’m reading this wrong, you’re right and I don’t understand the point of this story.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        She did outperform the s&p. She crushed it. She beat Warren Buffett as well

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Keyword being did. If you pick the right window of my stock portfolio you could say the same thing.

          When one wants to be upset and it’s easiest to be upset about things one doesn’t understand. When someone else starts pulling the levers of one’s misunderstandings, they become a tool.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Disguised Republican propaganda, there hasn’t been a year where Pelosi was number one since people started keeping an eye on her moves and she’s always getting beat by a bunch of Republicans no one cares about.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Considering that most people don’t realize that she’s not #1 and that she even got beat by the S&P in 2022, I think it’s fair to say that it’s pretty well disguised

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Republicans are obsessed with pelosi owning stocks as if she’s the only person in Congress who does it. I guess it takes the heat of everyone else… I read a list of the top 10 stock owners and profit makers in Congress, one of course the top ones were republicans.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          “Waahhh” huh? What a ridiculous reply.

          Okay, how’s Tommy Tuberville? But who cares. I’m not visiting your “x” link but sources I’ve seen don’t even have pelosi in the top 10. Republicans are just obsessed with attacking her even now that she’s not Speaker. Talk about “waahhh”. That’s fine, if you want to engage in massive hypocrisy, wring your hands about imaginary problems and pretend everything bad is democrats, that’s very on brand for conservatives.

          Anyway, yes, you should be concerned about ethical lapses of Congress members even if you don’t recognize their names.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Where’d that data come from? Do congresspeople have public portfolios?

              If so, it becomes a solved problem because we can just subscribe to the top performers’ portfolios to keep up (and nullify their advantage).

              If they don’t have public portfolios how was this generated?

              • realcaseyrollins
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, all their portfolios are public. Unusual Whales actually tracks all their trades and offers tools to mimic their trades if you so desire. Many people watch what stocks people like Nancy Pelosi purchase and use them to guide their own decision-making.