• Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Think about it this way. In 1960, minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the average home was $11,000.00 In 1968, when Richard Nixon took office, ‘middle class’ meant one Union job supporting a family of four. By the time Bush Se. left office in 1992 “middle class” was two college jobs to support the household.

  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There’s a middle class. They are the ones that don’t need the assistance.

    The vast majority of the lower class however cling on to defining themselves as middle class for some reason.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Pretty much everyone calls themselves middle class. Outside of the extremes one would expect, there will always be richer and poorer people among you, meaning you’re in the “middle” - whether you’re struggling to make rent or debating whether or not to go to the vacation home this weekend.

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    They widened the definition of middle class in order to mask the amount of actual poor people. I like This video of how people actually use their money. Supposedly 20% of people make 25k a year 😱

    “The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there…just to scare the shit out of the middle class.” -George Carlin’

    • turtletracks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      50k is hardly a livable wage, let alone 25k. It’s absurd that people can ever think a full time job shouldn’t pay the bills

  • anarcho_blinkenist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The “middle class” never existed. The “middle class” is an invented wedge to split the working class and try to turn segments of itself, against itself. It has no material basis. It is the ‘myth of upward mobility under capitalism’ distilled into a propaganda phrase to obscure the dualistic and antagonistic class relations in capitalist society between the PROPERTIED and UNPROPERTIED (those who own capital and those who do not), and the contradictions and conflicts therein.

    It is false consciousness; personified by and in the ‘middle manager’ who is PROPERTYLESS (proletarian), but paid more and promised the “opportunity of more to come” to align themselves with the interests of the PROPERTIED, and take on the role of a low-level overseer – to function as both a compliance enforcer and a mediative focus-dulling pain-sponge standing in the middle of, and soaking up the conflict between, the ONLY REAL TWO CLASSES IN CAPITALIST SOCIETY: The Worker, and the Capitalist.

    “Middle class” is liberal sleight-of-hand in its core and conception, and a term to be derided and discarded in all use, except as a magnifying glass to show the ways capitalism distorts and deceives about the real nature of its own properties and relations; and how the ruling class generates and contributes to the development of false consciousness through their reframing of production’s own characteristics, in order to reify into political “identities” to be captured and capitalized upon those roles which naturally manifest out of the laws of functional industrial-productive logistics, ie. the need for ‘managers’ to administrate complex or large-scale productive and distributive tasks. This serves double roles in the laws of colonial and imperial relations in places like the USA, as this distinction is also in practice highly racialized and rooted in the ongoing historical unfolding of these basal-and-superstructural systems of exploitation.

    Make note of the conspicuous absences and obfuscations when duopolist-exploiter X or Y says they “fight for the middle class;” that they are not fighting for you or me in the working class, but pandering to those “temporarily embarrassed millionaires” that they’ve bought off enough or otherwise tricked into this false consciousness, to give them their ever-shrinking electoral margins they require and fight each other over so they don’t have to pay any mind to the working class masses who make up the majority; because they in reality work for the big bourgeois, the capitalists, and the petty-bourgeois “small business tyrants” who think of themselves as capitalists — all at the expense of the working class domestically and abroad.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      We have great upward mobility here though and it’s a capitalistic country.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This guy capitalisms ^

      For those who haven’t had their coffee yet this morning - ‘middle class’ is yet another term they use to divide us and make us fight with each other instead of the real enemy

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah I’m for sure reading that later. My brain is just reading this like one of those sovereign citizen rants right now, despite there actually being valid points. I think it’s the emphasised word that’s messing with me.

        Hell of a ‘first post reply of the day’

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 hours ago

    C) is incorrect. it should read, C) Rich people taste like stringy grainy hamburger with 98% fat.