FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 months agoI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1166arrow-down11
arrow-up1165arrow-down1imageI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareUlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·3 months agoIf subtext is for cowards, what is cop-talk passive language?
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 months agoThe negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
minus-squarefrauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 months ago…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now
If subtext is for cowards, what is cop-talk passive language?
The negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now