• Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That’s completely untrue.

    Evolution applies to the entire lifespan — if we could “reproduce” but died in childbirth every time, our species would have gone extinct long ago.

    Parents and grandparents also contribute greatly to the success of a child long long after they’re born, helping to ensure it also survives to reproductive age.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      7 months ago

      “grandparents”

      Life expectancy in 18th century France was in the 20s, grandparents are optional

      • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        65
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t disagree with your overall point, but statistics like that are almost always heavily skewed because of high infant mortality rates

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The mortality rate during childbirth was pretty high for women on top of the infant rate. Childbirth as a whole dragged the numbers down.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            The mortality of mothers only became a big issue between doctors being in charge of birth and hand washing becoming a rule

            • tetris11@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The domestication of storks has also led to fewer deaths upon delivery. I wish to also add something to this thread of reddit factoids.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          18th century france is also quite possibly the single worst place and point in time to use as a comparison, there’s a reason people beheaded monarchs.

      • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        A reminder that life expectancy in ancient history was so low not because people generally croaked by 40, but because of how many children died young.

        It’s an average, not a maximum. People regularly lived into their 70s and 80s hundreds of years ago.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          From what i’ve read and heard about the subject, the life expectancy generally looked something like this back in the hunter-gatherer days:

          You were very likely to die as an infant, pretty likely to die before puberty, after that you were likely to make it to 40-50, and it wasn’t that rare to reach 70.