What’s the point of federation, when we will end up having large clumps of users in specific communites under instances, where the owners of the instance can censor information, and enforce their political ideological false authory over everyone. If somebody doesn’t agree they can be banned without any valid reason. Federation is censorship resistant only to large government entities. We fail to realise that the issue with censorship is the owners and admins.

And yes, we can meke new instances that support our beliefs and that doesnt censor our speech, but then again we dont have an evenly distributed userbase. Having duplicate communities is cojnter intuitive anyways because it will confuse users. Lemmy is a failed project in my eyes unless they find a way to resolve these issues somehow.

Bad example but if i start a torrent, then the people who seed will own just as much of the torrent as i do. I’ll be equal with the peers without any upper hand. It cant be taken down or censored. Thats the idea i had.

  • Alice@exploding-heads.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t even bother trying to waste your time rationalizing with a person who clearly has a political bias and psychotic sense of self-righteousness.

    These types of people are generally blissfully unaware of their own ignorance and hypocrisy.

    Your post touch on very important points about Lemmy. And I’m glad you posted it. We need more people like you raising these questions.