According to GIMPS, this is the first time a prime number was not found by an ordinary PC, but rather a “‘cloud supercomputer’ spanning 17 countries” that utilized an Nvidia A100 GPU chip to make the initial diagnosis. The primary architect of this find is Luke Durant, who worked at Nvidia as a software engineer for 11 years

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      52
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes. The amount of effort and resources used to do this shouldn’t just be a fucking waste.

      This is a fucking waste. Proper fucking waste.

      Nobody will use this math in our lifetime. Probably not the next generation either. We’re incapable of using it in any meaningful way except bragging rights.

        • wagesj45@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even if it’s true, he’s just admitting that he doesn’t care about future generations. Fuck them kids, I guess.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not a presumption when there is no basis for it all. It’s a fucking fact.

          If there was a segment of society that said “Hey, we really want to do this thing, but we really just need the highest prime number possible! Why won’t anyone find that for us?” Then I’d say OK.

          You’ve got a guy out to beat a record and get his name on the books here. Useless.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            2 months ago

            That segment exists. That’s literally why they are continually trying to find larger primes.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                No idea, I’m neither a cryptographer nor mathematician. All I know is that they’re used somehow. Something about multiplying two large primes to get a big number. Apparently it’s a challenge to factor that number to derive the original primes, and that challenge is what makes breaking a cryptographic algorithm difficult.

                • AlotOfReading@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Any cryptography you’re likely to encounter uses fixed size primes over a residue ring for performance reasons. These superlarge primes aren’t relevant for practical cryptography, they’re just fun.

                • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Well allow me to retort:

                  There isn’t a CPU on this planet that will digest this number in any meaningful way out to this decimal. Not as a whole at least.

                  That’s why this was clearly computed on a GPU. They’re good at that.

                  We also have news of the first stages of prime numbers being cracked on Quantum Computers with amazing efficiency. So whatever this number is will be useless soon.