• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Ohhh, so that’s why these movies came out on the open seas so quickly. I guess it’s an unintended consequence of their greed.

    • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Personally I would never pay for a PVOD release. It’s best to use that money to buy the Blu-ray, at least then you actually get to keep it.

    • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      PVOD (premium video-on-demand) is when you pay a one-time price to watch the movie digitally on platforms like iTunes, Amazon Prime, Vudu, Google Play, etc.

      Personally, at those prices, I’d much rather wait for the Blu-ray release.

      • realcaseyrollins
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The one thing I’ll give PVOD is that sometimes (especially for indie or smaller releases) a movie will be in 4K on PVOD but only in 1080p on Blu-Ray. I still always go for the Blu-Ray copy though.

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Wonder if this is a side effect of theater ticket sales crashing like they’re made by Boeing?

    IIRC, it’s something like 30% lower, so they have to make up this revenue somewhere, so PPV/PVOD/whatever prices are up and I’d be shocked if they stopped here.

    • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s correct.

      Fun fact: last year, The Super Mario Bros. Movie made $75 million in PVOD sales. Additionally, studios get a bigger cut of the money in PVOD - instead of splitting it half-and-half with the theaters, they get about 80% of the profits.

      And the best part? It’s all digital, so there’s little to no manufacturing costs, and they won’t “run out of stock”.

      It’s no wonder they’re focusing so much on digital these days.

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    PVOD is such a stupid rip-off. It’s basically just making sure the good quality pirated version gets out before the movie is available for a reasonable renting price.

    • realcaseyrollins
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      PVOD is pretty good, actually, IMHO better than streaming. Renting isn’t perfect, but I’d rather pay $5 to watch something one night than subscribe to something for $12/mo so I can watch the same thing with ads.

      $25 ain’t bad if it’s an indefinite rental, but paying so much for 48 hour access is insane! It’s not like you’re getting a premium experience in a theater or something, in which case I get it.

      • anakin78z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I disagree. Paying $25 for a family of 4 and having the added bonus of not putting up with theater bullshit (e.g. ridiculous candy prices and asshole people) seems like a damn good deal.

        • realcaseyrollins
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Nobody’s making you buy candy. And people at the theaters actually aren’t that bad.

          If PVOD rentals were still in theaters you’d have a point, and that applies for the movies mentioned in the articles. But most movies on PVOD are out of the theaters.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m a good little consumer. I pay my Disney tax. But, errrm, “PVOD” just means “Prepare VPN, Or Delay.” At this point in my life and the media landscape, it’s mostly “Delay.”