When given a choice between a millitary industrial neoliberal with a rainbow voting base and a fascist who is one elon musk golf session away from banning HRT, the best option is certainly not to refuse to play out of protest

  • SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Pictured: Newly-unveiled biologically-engineered troops of the National Guard enforcing the new State Ideology of Obamunism in Mar-a-Lago (2009, colorized)

  • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The best way I’ve seen anyone put it is that by the time the election arrives, you are exclusively in damage control mode. If you want actual change, you have to have it done by getting your personal choice voted in during the primaries.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And I’d add - get active the other 364 days of the year.

      If we want better options we first need ranked choice voting and we need to get money out of politics. And none of that is going to happen if our only political action each year is voting.

      • ProfessorPeregrine@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Proud to say that in Colorado, ranked choice voting is on the ballot this year! It’s even supported by the big political names here, including the governor.

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Exactly! They’re putting in the work there and getting some fantastic things done. Lots of other great stuff on that ballot too.

    • bamfic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      At local level. Organize school board, dog catcher, judges, city council, planing commission, library board, community college board, do what the right wing does

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        This is really key, though the state level is probably most important. If your voting activism doesn’t go beyond the presidential election, it’s performative at most. A third party candidate without members of their party is state houses and Congress is going to be fairly ineffective even if they somehow did do the impossible and get elected.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yes. And Biden was chosen, which includes Harris being next up if Biden couldn’t perform the duties of president for any reason. If Democrats didn’t want the status quo, they should have chosen someone other than Biden.

        • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          How did nobody notice Biden’s brain no longer works if there was this robust primary process you describe and we all just missed it?

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            we all just missed it?

            You missed it. I was well aware of it, and concerns about Biden at the time, and I don’t even live in the US.

            Not everyone else’s fault if you don’t engage with the political system until less than a month before the election. That’s what this entire post is about.

            • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The party not allowing debates and threatening everyone to stay out so only an ice cream millionaire who was leaving congress anyway did a quixotic “run” in an attempt to hide how bad Biden had gotten is not a real primary. Just because you don’t grasp verbal irony isn’t everyone else’s fault.

  • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Honestly we just had an election where I live where the options were (not to this extreme at all) but pretty similar in the “not great” vs “fucking awful” choices. Of course we had an actual third party with good policies but they had no chance. The race was so close here that in some areas the difference in votes was in the hundreds for the top two choices. They’re still doing recounts and I guess we’ll see, but every single fucking vote has counted on this.

    I honestly don’t believe that not voting is ever going to work. If we want change we need an actual fucking revolution. Not voting, in American’s case, would just allow for the literal militants to take over and then you really won’t even have the choice to protest anything in the future.

    • Lou Frogno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      16 hours ago

      We need to focus on prefigurative politics, I.e, build the world we want to see with direct action, unionizing, and mutual aid, since voting and governments are never going to do it for us.

      However, who is in charge of your country will make those prefigurative politics more or less hard, or even impossible (can’t imagine much of the above going on in Nazi Germany…)

      I think it goes without saying that it will be less hard under Harris.

  • hate2bme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    And remember to vote for whoever you want. Just because you vote third party doesn’t mean your vote is wasted or to vote for somebody else because who knows who you would have voted for if it wasn’t for third party. Those people that say that shit can fuck off.

    Edit: y’all are just as bad as maga losers. If I don’t vote for your guy, it’s a wasted vote. Just go out and vote, period, for whoever you want. Ignore all these people trying to get you to vote for their person. Vote for whomever YOU like. Nothing wrong with endorsing a candidate but trying to make someone look stupid or evil for voting is really pathetic.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Literally no. If they were gonna vote Trump instead but decided to go with Harris, their vote is worth the same as someone who would always vote Harris or the vote of a leftist who decided on damage reduction.

          Any voting system flattens our personal motivations into a single action. Any statement you’re looking to make is moot unless you have a massive campaign to make it clear outside of the ballot box. Even then, the establishment can downplay and misinterpret your motivation as not being representative or as less important than what they want to believe.

          There’s no better way to translate our will into results. Any system that doesn’t use free and fair voting can be tainted and colored by bias, making it impossible to ever undermine the will of the establishment. They will always choose to believe whatever is most convenient, but votes can deliver a reality shock that forces them to adjust their behavior, even if they never change their minds. The only other thing capable of that is violence.

    • Sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Either Harris or Trump are going to win the election. Not voting for Harris is voting for Trump. Yes, it fucking sucks, but especially if you’re a woman or a queer person, really think about whether you actually think it doesn’t matter which one wins.

      Voting is not an endorsement of a candidate. It’s a tool. Don’t let them take away your rights while you’re waiting for the perfect candidate that will never come.

      • Moss@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Charitable read: I think they’re talking in general, not just for the president. voting third party is actually pretty viable in certain areas of the country for certain state positions

    • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Except it is wasted because there is literally zero chance a 3rd party candidate will win the presidency. If we’re talking lower offices, then maybe, but if you’re not voting Harris then you are directly assisting Trump.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There is value in showing third parties are growing more popular. It’s the first step that needs to happen for a third party candidate to become truely viable.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The first step that needs to happen is building up a third party through local politics, not ignoring politics for 3 years and 11 months and then suddenly expecting a third party to become viable.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And yet, if there was ever a time where that isn’t worth it, it’s when fascists have a high chance of winning. Trump is not a right wing liberal; he wants to destroy the liberal world order that America controls just so no one can threaten his dictatorial power at home.

          That may seem like it could benefit leftists elsewhere, but he wants to go to war with neighbors and bully other countries even harder than the liberal empire did. Where the American empire leaves, the Russian empire will take its place. All the while, an old man with no desire to leave a lasting legacy for his family or country is in control of the most powerful war machine on earth.

    • Moss@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      yes but also if you’re in a swing state maybe don’t vote third party for the executive office. Rn the thrid party persidential candidates aren’t super strong, and the bulk of political momentum is bipartisan. Local and state gov is a totally different situation depending on your state.

      • Sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Good point. A candidate from a party that doesn’t really have a presence in any level of government and especially zero seats in congress will probably never have a realistic chance of winning the presidential election, barring some exceptional circumstances. If you like a third party, trying to make it viable at the local level and moving up from there seems to be the only realistic option to me.

      • Moss@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        like the working families party, who actually have some substantial influence in the new york area

        • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Working Families is actually stronger than the democrats out here. I vote WF everywhere their name pops up. They got governors in out here in Oregon.

          • Moss@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I’m a big supporter of the working families party. They rule. I honestly think they have the best chance of any of the third parties of eventually becoming a viable player in the American political sphere

    • grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m down for leaving people to vote for who they want, as long as they allow their protest votes to weigh heavily on their consciences when January comes around and we suddenly live in the fourth reich

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ll never pretend to respect their decision. They might not even accept they were wrong when they’re inside the gas chambers. Besides, them feeling guilty is no justice for dooming people to death. It would be an injustice nobody could ever set right.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Remember: the only people who say this want to see Trump win. You can vote with your conscience all you want, but it’s only mathematically possible for only one of two parties to get elected.

      If third parties or independents actually wanted a shot, they’d put in the work outside of elections, building coalitions and locally from the ground up.