Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week’s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

    • s3p5r@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Help me out, the coffee isn’t working today and I still don’t get it. How does bribery fit in?

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Ads are used to influence customers, right, but how many people on train station are about to buy a fighter jet or a tank? (Maybe it’s a part of recruitment strategy) If they wanted to influence DoD or elected representatives then there are more direct options

        Instead, remember that ads are paid for, and nobody needs to know how much, and that money probably is much less tightly controlled

        • s3p5r@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Ah, thankyou for bearing with me, I see what you mean.

          I just assumed there must be a large military office nearby and they were targeting the procurement personnel who do the actual contract and tender work, plus maybe the manufacturer headquarters is nearby and this is part of one of the more revolting symptoms of a highly militarized capitalist culture. I didn’t get quite as far as drawing the connection to targeting politicians and staffers who likely can’t put a meeting with missile sales reps on their publicly documented calendars, but that makes a lot of sense.

          • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            there’s another thing in american context specifically: generally keeping defense manufacturers in state is a popular decision among voters (both parties) because it brings DoD contracts (lots of money) and well paid both blue and white collar jobs. this in turn influences back procurement decisions (a bit) (hey, my state has a factory of this junk obsolete since it was on drawing board (like A10), can you put some money in it? closing that factory would lose me an election)

            this is more clearly seen in nuclear weapons manufacture, against all logic it’s spread around the country with little reliable logistics between these sites

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          yep, and alongside: go-nowhere hype-du-jour businesses are a remarkably good vehicle for pushing money from A->B for many of these people