cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1119656

The [email protected] community on this instance thrived for a while and reached almost 19k subscribers very rapidly and it was very active.

Recently the Reddit mods of r/Android created another community with a few hundred members on another different instance where they are mods and that one was then astroturfed on c/android by a person seemingly unrelated to that community’s mods.

Apparently some discussions then took place between owners of both communities and the mods of [email protected] community then unilaterally closed the community, thus, according to their own sticky notice, succumbing to the flawed reasoning that the Reddit mods are “more experienced” and therefore the rightful representatives of an Android community.

I find this behavior sad and it just shouldn’t be allowed here for two reasons:

  • this sets the precedent for more Reddit mods to just come and claim “ownership” of communities by bullying existing ones into closing;
  • does not respect the almost 19k subscribers who didn’t even have a say in this, and especially those who had already expressed that they joined [email protected] because they did NOT want to be moderated by the old Reddit mods.

[email protected] needs to be reopened now and the mods removed since they expressed that they no longer want to moderate a community on lemmy.world.

  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What they did is and should be allowed, simply because nobody has or should have the authority to prohibit them from doing it.

    But it should also be the case that by abandoning the original community, they lost all claim to it, so anyone else who wants to should be free to claim it. I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s already the case, and if not, it should be.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But it should also be the case that by abandoning the original community, they lost all claim to it, so anyone else who wants to should be free to claim it. I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s already the case, and if not, it should be.

      That’s the whole point, the mod in question and the other Reddit mod who’s behind this move to forcibly extinguish [email protected] are preventing that, the community is still to this hour forcibly closed and forced to serve as a shameless redirection page.

      (the “moderators” (which they aren’t anymore since they lost any claim to this community) being 2 people out of almost 19k subscribers)

      They have the audacity to argue for the legitimacy of them alone deciding to deprive 19k subscribers of the community and force [email protected] to remain a redirection page to the Reddit mods’ instance to siphon off its 19k users by leaving them no choice but to move to the Reddit mods’ new 3 days old community and that if we don’t let them do this then it is “subverting moderator discretion” and being “like Reddit”.

  • TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Having had more time to read over the arguments in the other thread, I do think that the community c/android here on lemmy.world should be reclaimed. Maybe after a little while, so the redirect has the intended effect - it was their community, and I think it’s fair to give them a little time to try and get people to consolidate to where they wish, but after that let someone else have the name.

    What I do not agree with is your framing of the situation. You have instantly escalated things by insisting this was bullying when that has been confirmed to not be the case, and are trying to pin the mods who decided to do this as intentional bad / rogue actors without actually giving them a chance to resolve the situation in a manner you find acceptable. Did you even message these mods first?

    Why do we need to carry over this intense hatred and assuming the worst of others from Reddit? Can’t we leave this bad habit behind and try to actually solve problems reasonably before resorting to inflammatory posts?

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      bullying

      We can disagree on the term but it was, and I still insist, essentially soft-bullying when they push bogus arguments like their instance “being better because of custom patches” and highlight that they are r/Android mods. It doesn’t have to be openly malicious, in fact they were doing it while being cordial. That’s still intimidation.

      • ijeff@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Crossposting my comment here, as I just noticed the conversation has moved to this thread.

        I think you’re mistaken on a few things here:

        1. The offer was not made behind closed doors, nor was there intimidation. You can see the offer here. Ultimately, moderating depends on a lot of effort by many volunteers. Lemmy moderation tools aren’t quite there yet and we need each others’ help to keep these communities safe and informative.
        2. It’s a good thing to share the burden. Ruud and team are making outstanding efforts to keep lemmy.world operational, but this is very costly and arduous work. It’s a good thing to distribute that load across multiple servers.
        3. We’re working to encourage more communities transition from Reddit to Lemmy. For those of us around for the Digg to Reddit migrations (both the 2007 and 2010 waves), we’re hopeful about helping solidify Lemmy’s place going forward while challenging the current Reddit administrator’s overbearing approach to communities for the sake of business interests. We have nothing to gain from volunteering. We just like to help foster the types of communities we ourselves like to be part of.
        4. Lemmy works differently from Reddit. This is perhaps the most important point that I think some folks migrating from Reddit might misunderstand. You do not need to be on the same instance as the community you’re accessing! In fact, [email protected] exists within Lemmy.world. Nobody needs to make a new account, and nobody is leaving. That’s the beauty of the Fediverse!
        • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Look, this all leaves a bad look on your new instance while all of this could have been handled much more smoothly without the need for astroturfing a few days ago (I know you claim the user isn’t affiliated with you, but it still felt weird that literally after that you answer with another ad for your instance “it’s not us we’re sorry, anyway here’s why you should join us”) and then coordinate this shameless closure of [email protected] over your private chat. It could have been handled in a friendly way just like many c/Technology communities coexist across instances without the need for one to feel the need to extinguish all the other "Technology"s.

          • ijeff@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            That will be a decision for lemmy.world admin to decide. However, I think it’s important that mergers be considered distinct from closures/abandonment. Previously on Reddit, moderators would sometimes merge their teams to keep up with workloads. This would mean locking one subreddit. If such a community were to be requested on r/redditrequest, it would be denied because it wasn’t abandoned, but instead repurposed as a way to redirect members.

            Opting to fulfill such requests would be more in line with the current Reddit admin approach of overriding existing moderators. It’s a valid path to take, but one that I would be very hesitant to support. I think a community could be opened up if truly abandoned (i.e., the place it redirects has been retired and the moderators are no longer logging into the Fediverse).

            • trouser_mouse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s definitely a complex issue - and totally agree, mergers are not the same.

              It does feel disingenuous for you to dodge a yes or no question.

              I’m not trying to be rude, but setting up a new instance without clear (edit - server level) policies and rules and no GDPR compliance and then expecting people to move over rather than choose to move doesn’t look great.

              If you want everyone over to your instance because of whatever reasons you should be very transparent why and have it set up appropriately before that move starts - and be plain that you don’t want competing communities.

              If you are happy to have multiple communities, it’s easy just to say you support that.

              • ijeff@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sorry if it sounded like a dodge (it’s also 5 AM here so I’m half asleep). Certainly wasn’t my intent. My opinion is that admin shouldn’t be taking away communities from moderators unless they’ve truly abandoned, not merged. But I also recognize this will be something for each instance’s admin to decide.

                But the question of multiple communities in terms of starting a different one or supporting another alternative? That’s great and an integral part of the Fediverse - each community will be a reflection of their particular rulesets and approaches to moderation.

                Folks are absolutely welcome to access the community from other instances. There’s no need to switch your login. One my fellow mods actually runs his own instance that he logs in through.

                Some other options: https://lemmy.ml/c/android (probably the oldest on Lemmy) kbin.social/m/android squabbles.io/s/android

                I shared some more insights about rationale for the instance in my earlier posts if you don’t mind checking my history. I’d get you the links but I’m about to pass out! I didn’t manage the Mike and Devgard’s transition but I’d be happy to answer any questions you might have. Just leave them here and I’ll respond tomorrow.

                • trouser_mouse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Definitely time for a sleep!

                  I have seen your other comments, and I think my issue is (hopefully obviously!) not at all with you, but it is the principle - the choice of multiple communities is being taken away.

                  For what it is worth (not much) I think you wanting to take load off .world is great, and you patiently answer people’s questions and are polite and helpful. As I said, I don’t mean to be rude, but if this was happening to a community I was invested in I would be angry and rightly so I think (but to be clear I have never posted on Android, and really it is the principle).

                  You are doing what seems to be a good job handling a tricky situation, although I think your server needs some clear policies and goals and server-level rules, clear information about funding and GDPR compliance etc. to help build trust. My personal opinion based on seeing one post is that Mike, on the other hand, is not handing this well at all - and comes across as very rude and really condescending and I have replied to his post saying this. Responses you have made compared to his are miles apart. That’s just my impression, and not meant as a personal attack. I would hope he can look at how you post and learn from it. Good luck with the moderation if recent responses are how he speaks to people!

                • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  merged

                  Bro, not to be rude, but that’s literally abandoning the current one. You can sugarcoat it and use all the fancy words however you want, the fact remains that you closed the community for 19k people and the decision was made only by 2 mods after you’ve shamelessly asked them to do that over private chat. 19k users didn’t even have a choice and one of your new mods even made it openly clear that he doesn’t give a shit what 19k users think and that it’s bad luck for those who don’t like the forced closure:

                  I’m not aware of any charter that says I’m obligated in any form to offer the community a say in the decision. Should I have? Morally, there’s obviously an argument for yes. But did I have to, no. The choice was mine, and I made one. It’s your bad luck that I started the community, I suppose.

                  This one-man decision can never be called a “merger”, just stop deceiving yourselves. Again, it’s a forced closure by 2 current mods and new Reddit mods who couldn’t imagine a world where they don’t own the community. I repeat, you robbed 19k users of their choice to stay here, it is a forced closure. There is no “merger” just because you agreed with how Reddit was running things in the past (and conveniently leave out that right now they don’t allow for locked communities either).

        • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And [email protected] exists within lemdro.id, that’s also the beauty of the Fediverse. I don’t trust your instance (and I don’t have to even think about it, no offense) and I, and I’m sure many too but they weren’t even given a voice and you see nothing wrong with it, were already happy with our community here. You have no right to expect us to close it for you to grow your 3 days old one.

          • ijeff@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m sure more folks will chime in when they’re awake due to time zones, but the majority who are voting on their announcement seem to be supportive thus far?

            • trouser_mouse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I absolutely support you setting up a new community, but absolutely don’t support closing down the original one here on this instance - people should be able to decide which community they prefer. One will naturally grow to be the dominant one.

              .world are transparent about funding and approach, have clear policies in place. I can’t currently see any of that on .id, and the only thing I have to go off is posts you have made and the conversation around it.

              To me, it feels very disingenuous and currently your instance is not at all transparent and more importantly not GDPR compliant from what I can see - therefore, how can I trust it?

              • cole@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Hello, I’ve built software to be GDPR compliant before… so far as I can tell, NO Lemmy instance is GDPR compliant yet due to no way for the original server to delete user content from remote servers. Is this wrong?

                • trouser_mouse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think you’re right. Some instances do what they can to be compliant, e.g. .world have various notices and wording in place but no cookie information and consent etc.

                  The data and how it is transferred and processed and stored, along with deletion requests I have no idea how that is going to be compliant!

              • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                This, the dude is just giving us more reasons to completely break this shit and kick the current insecure mods out and forcibly reopen the community. I’ll remind everyone here of what the other mod said when asked about whether the 19k people have a say in this:

                I’m not aware of any charter that says I’m obligated in any form to offer the community a say in the decision. Should I have? Morally, there’s obviously an argument for yes. But did I have to, no. The choice was mine, and I made one. It’s your bad luck that I started the community, I suppose.

                A person saying this should be removed immediately. A mod saying this, and with [email protected] still supporting him since part of the deal is that this mod will become a mod on the new community of the foreign instance, should not be trusted anywhere, even on the new instance.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      and I think it’s fair to give them a little time to try and get people to consolidate to where they wish

      I disagree because it’s also the 19k users’ community as well and many never asked for any of this and are being interrupted from participating in it because of the whims of one single person. It should be reopened immediately and the former (because I don’t recognize he has any claim anymore as he officially abandoned it) mod can promote his new community elsewhere just like everyone else does. No one owes them a “redirection pause” and that’s inappropriate vis-a-vis the 19k members who are still being coerced to move elsewhere.

      • TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless there is some kind of federation issue any user could just follow the redirect and subscribe / participate in the other community with practically no hassle. I was able to subscribe to the communities on the new instance just fine. Any interruption of browsing would be solely due to stubbornness of not moving off principle. And maybe that principle is justified - maybe the new space will be moderated differently, in a way you find worse - but it does not change the fact that ultimately this is a small issue and you are blowing it out of proportion, on purpose, for no good reason.

        • ijeff@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also worth noting that the migration also means being open to beehaw users as well. We’d do a proper automated redirect and import over existing history if we could. The aim isn’t to cause disruption. What’s great about Lemmy is the ability to both not switch instances when accessing other communities and the ability to switch instances as needed.

        • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not blown out of proportions because many, me included, simply never asked to move. If this is allowed then parking community names to force users to go to other communities should also be allowed.

          • TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not like you’re being forced to move to a new house or something. It’s like two clicks on a website.

            I’m not saying that this issue isn’t a real one, I’m trying to say you’re being much too angry about it and (intentionally or not) stirring up a little witchhunt when this could be handled much more casually.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      bad / rogue actors

      I didn’t even say this, but now that you ask me, closing the community without asking for the approval of the members, and then tell me that he still believes he doesn’t think he is “obligated in any form to offer the community a say in the decision” (his exact words) is something I’d attribute indeed to a bad actor.

    • Rottcodd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      when that has been confirmed to not be the case

      Quick epistemological clarification - nothing has been “confirmed” to be or not be the case.

      It has been asserted by one of the actors that the action taken was not malicious or underhanded or whatever. In the simplest terms, in response to the accusation that they acted in a malicious way, one of the actors said the equivalent of “Did not!”

      That might well be true. It might even be argued that it’s likely true (though I would say that the combination of the backroom dealing with which it was done, the capricious way in which the decision was just presented to the community literally at the last second as a fait accompli, the opaque nature of the new instance and the arrogance and disdain displayed in the linked response all serve to undermine that likelihood). But the simple fact of the matter is that it’s just an assertion, and the truth value of that assertion cannot be known for a certainty by anyone else, so it does not and cannot rise to the level necessary to serve as “confirmation” of anything.

  • nosut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yea like are you fucking kidding. Why should a community of 18k people shut down on the whim of 2 people and move to a place with a fraction of the members and far less history. If they are just planning to park the community name then the admins should step in and either remove it so a new community could be made or allow someone willing to take over. Lets not skip over the fact the lemdro.id is a newer instance with no real track record either.

  • Slowy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think if the mods don’t want to have a community open they can decide to close it, fine. But parking the name so no one else can use it isn’t great. It should just be deleted and if someone wants to start one on that instance again they can. But giving people the ability to make ghost communities on any other instance to reduce competition is probably not good overall

    • kayaven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      This sounds like it could potentially turn into something like Meta getting the upper hand over some community, by making sure a link to their instance’s version of the community is posted on many of these kind of parked communites. And they realistically have the time, money, influence and people to make it happen, which worries me even more. They really could just bribe people if need be.

      As long as we stay open about these kinds of approaches from large tech companies, we should be okay. But it will definitely come down to the strength of each individual community mod team.

  • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Part of the beauty of Lemmy is that you can just start a new community on a new instance. I don’t like people referring to things as c/Something, because that community often exists on multiple instances. Sometimes very active on both/all. You can create a new community on another instance, with whatever rules you deem appropriate, and convince people to join you - which is what happened with [email protected]

    Their logic seems pretty solid, though. The old Reddit mods didn’t just claim ownership - they reached out to the [email protected] mods and made their case. The mods at [email protected] were completely free to tell them to piss off, or welcome them in, or whatever else. They chose this path, and laid out their reasons (although they weren’t required to). You may not like it, or agree, but that’s generally how mods are handled.

    In fact, I see giving you the mod permissions as a hostile takeover by you. You were not a mod, they made their decision, and now you want to takeover all of their work.

    • Pika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Personally speaking, I don’t agree with hostile takeovers. but honestly I feel something should be done about it. it sets a potential precedent where communities in other instances can make ghost communities and just park the name. In a perfect world, the new mods should be someone who was active in the community and not some random person who requested it but, honestly that is a lot of work, and if the moderation team didn’t bother to want to do that work, I wouldn’t see it unfit to have the admin team make the decision, be it nuke the community, or reassign another mod or something. Honestly though it’s their instance, if they see it fit they could just choose to do nothing but, I feel it would be best for the instance to not have parked communities, especially big name communities such as Android that people would want to have as a community, it hinders growth of the instance (not that this instance is in dire need of more growth but long term)

      I would be all for an addition of some sort of “Dead Community” policy(if there isn’t one already, but I have not seen it). It could be as simple as communities that are intending to park have so many days before the community gets purged, or it could have a similar system that Facebook, Discord, Reddit(although they abused this policy) and other sites have where it’s handled on a case by case basis upon a request being brought up.

      • ijeff@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts on this. I’d just like to clarify there was no hostile takeover! I posted a comment above with some more context, as I feel this is being somewhat misrepresented. Of course, Id welcome any reactions you have to it.

        It’s also worth noting that subreddit mergers weren’t uncommon on reddit. Oftentimes two similar subreddits would merge as a way of combining moderation efforts (it’s a lot easier to keep things in check with a larger team to cover more time zones). Despite all our gripes with how Reddit admin have been behaving as of late, even they didn’t intervene on subreddit mergers by forcing one back open through redditrequest.

        • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So you’ve made it clear that your position is that lemmy.world’s community should be closed based on the whims of 2 people to allow for your 3 days old community to grow. Good to know where you stand.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their work and the work of 18k other people that now have no say in the matter.

      • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A valid point, but non-mods don’t usually have a lot of say unless the mods choose to solicit input. It’s a sign of bad mods to be sure, but one that happens all of the time. And of course, some mods will ask but just not listen.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      they made their decision

      2 out of 19k people made the unilateral decision for those 19k to close the community in total disrespect of those users who were very active and kept the community alive. They also do NOT have the right to deprive this instance from the c/android community name, that is the SAME as community parking. They have the right to leave but they do NOT have the right to close it for everybody else.

      • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        So why not create your own? Or migrate to [email protected] (already with 6k subs and very active), or [email protected] (empty and dead). Why does it have to be the existing one?

        Reddit was full of clone subs because of disagreeable mods. They had similar names (or at least recognizable names), but were run completely separate. You could also do that here, or start any name on (nearly) any instance you want.

      • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let me ask a different question - let’s say they had made a slightly different decision. Instead of moving to lemdr.id, let’s say the mods of [email protected] decided to bring on board all of the former r/Android mods. Instead of an announcement that it was being moved to a different location, it was announcing (and welcoming) all of their new mods.

        Is there anything really different about that scenario?

        • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s astonishing that you can’t see how 2 people closing down the community for 19k people on a whim is simply wrong and EXACTLY THE SAME as community name parking (I’d argue it’s even worse!). Community name parking is already NOT ALLOWED on lemmy.world.

            • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Those 2 certainly didn’t and they have no claim on that community anymore. As it stands right now, that community officially has no moderators and yes even if you’d apparently be happy to see it forcibly die instead, I perfectly have the right to volunteer to reopen [email protected] and then recruit mods from there, this is only fair for the 19k who were robbed of this community.

              • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Wait he just asked a valid question though.

                You keep speaking for the 19k, but you’re wanting to make a move yourself without consulting them either.

                Are you speaking for them or not?

                I really think if we’re going to talk about the 19k, the idea of a vote is probably what should’ve been done in retrospect

                • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  vote is probably what should’ve been done in retrospect

                  The idea of a vote doesn’t even make sense, because the democratic way to handle this would have been to keep the community open without forcing anyone to move. Those who want then to move can do so, nothing changes for them.

                  The way you’re suggesting a vote here is analogous to a group of people voting to kill another group of people. That’s not democratic.

                  You keep speaking for the 19k

                  I’m not. I’m advocating for opening the community again, which as I said earlier is the most democratic option after it was robbed from the 19k members. And yes, as the community is officially unmoderated, since the mods cannot have any claim on it after officially abandoning it, I have the right to volunteer to mod, as have others too obviously, and the admins can then choose.

      • TheJack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        @AlmightySnoo @Vamp thank you for your willingness to mod. Also, both of you should contact @ruud, I believe he’s the admin here.

    • trouser_mouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a great offer - there should be no issue with re-opening the existing community here under new mods, then people are free to go to whichever Android community they feel is a better home.

  • trouser_mouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have submitted a support ticket asking about the policy for squatting or if there is no policy noted it is best practice to introduce one. Also queried time frame to take over or set up a new community with the name. Ticket#692599.

    Completely respect people who have set up a community deciding to move away from it, but then to not allow others to take it over or set up a new one is questionable I think, and has a bunch of potential issues.

    Edit - to illustrate a point, I made Thrifty as it is a large Reddit community, and locked it. Someone has already contacted me to ask about it, within hours. It would not be fair or right of me to squat on it - I have obviously offered it to whoever wants it and linked to another similar sub in the meantime.

    Someone should be able to claim inactive or deliberately withheld communities.

  • BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t see a problem with this. The mods of the new community decided they would be better off working with another instance to create a larger, central community.

    Nobody was forcing the mods of the Lemmy.world group to close, nobody is forcing them to yield to Reddit mods. Communities are at the whim of the creator, not users. It’s always been the same on Reddit or any forum really.

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok, with your logic we should also roll over for Meta when Threads takes off since they have a larger community.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see meta/threads as a completely separate platform.

        And I expect that that’s going to happen no matter what

  • God@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes. Mods should be able to troll. Admins too. Everything is permitted. This is not a corporation or a government. It is all dictatorships. These little autocracies are what make lemmy great. 😌