• Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This headline should be “most computer users see little or no value in LLM and other technologies that are being branded as “AI” and never will”

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Outside of Gemini, Google has done a decent job at packaging AI features that have a tangible benefit to users. However, they seem to be more purpose built instead of LLM’s.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I find Gemini “somewhat useful”, on a smartphone. It’s not a game changer, but it can often answer the thing I want even when it misheard it, much better than Google Assistant.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Same is true of many other AI assistants. They’re really neat as a technical exercise, or for a bit of fun for 10-20 minutes. But when it comes to folding them into workflows, the utility is harder to grasp.

    Couple that with the extreme energy requirements of these systems, the worries about where the training data comes from, plus the fact that it feels like every single corporation is just flailing around “AI” because they see dollar signs… I’m pretty over it.

    • Mara@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Training GPT-3 (a model from 3 years ago) from scratch requires as much energy as is spent to raise two cows for meat.

  • ditty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    24 hours ago

    So far Apple Intelligence can help with writing, making pictures/emojis, and summarizing notifications, websites, emails, Messages, etc. I just don’t see a need for AI to do any of those tasks though. The picture one maybe

    • averyminya@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s the same for Samsung’s AI stuff, the only really useful one is it’s smart selecting features - cropping photos, taking out specific images for stickers/collaging.

      Everything else though is just the creativity I want to do being done for me.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Why would you need to summarize notifications? Usually each notification is just a short sentence, so there’s hardly anything you can do to shorten them further. Summarizing websites is far more useful though.

  • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Thankfully both it and Siri can be completely disabled or just not even installed in the former’s case.

  • TehPers@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    We tried the iPhone 16 recently, upgrading from a 14. Apple’s AI seemed basically useless. That combined with the dynamic island not respecting reduced motion settings lead us to return the phone instead and keep the 14. The old phone worked fine, but we wanted to try to get ahead of the incoming administration just in case.

    Maybe the 17 will be better?

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I found that Siri is a little more useful for answering questions with ChatGPT, but outside of that I don’t think I’ve come across another situation where I’ve needed Apple Intelligence.