• Lucy :3@feddit.org
    1071·
    3 days ago

    Support for proper Adblock:

    Firefox( forks): Yes
    Chrome( forks): No

    That simple.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      184·
      3 days ago

      In fairness, Brave does have a built-in ad blocker that (at least years ago) did an acceptable job and is a part of the binary, so is not impacted by Chromium’s Manifest V3 rug pull.

      If you decide that’s the way you want to go, though, you’re (1) trusting their promise to never remove it or degrade its effectiveness, (2) reducing your choice about how you experience ads, and (3) contributing to Google’s browser hegemony. So I definitely don’t recommend it.

      But technically it does have adblock.

      • Lucy :3@feddit.org
        10·
        3 days ago

        I have personally seen and always get told in comments etc., that builtin “adblockers” often fail or even deactivate on sites like YouTube etc. And there are always news about YouTube executing another genius strike, forcing everyone to disable their AdBlocker, due to non-loading videos, infinite forced ads etc. Yet - I never had any problems with uBlock + FF. Either it’s not affected in the first place, or fixed faster than Muskler can “Give out his heart”. And it does make sense - a nonprofit, open source extension is gonna be much more flexible than a rigid part of a for-profit browser. Brave/Opera users don’t even really care about actually blocking ads, I believe, they just like the placebo effect believing that anything has changed for the better.
        It could also be that uBlock + FF users are more likely to also use NoScript, which does a great deal of blocking ads and adblock detection systems. With some selecting, even extremely ad-infested sites like soap2day.pe work like a charm.

        The only times where uBlock has “failed” me: Some random website has a blank space instead of an Ad/Nothing, and every 10-20 videos on Pornhub, there’s a popup.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        2·
        3 days ago

        I can report that it works well on iOS. Considering Firefox doesn’t support extensions on that platform, that’s what I’ve been using. I’ve even uninstalled YouTube because it blocks its ads and allows me to play video in the background.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        1·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I use Vivaldi and it’s built-in blockers and privacy are great. So much control and customisation despite being Chromium based.

          • saltesc@lemmy.world
            1·
            3 days ago

            Yep. Works fine. There are some sites not using ad services where hard coded stuff appears, but you can set up element block rules so they never appear.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.worldEnglish
    55·
    3 days ago

    Brave seems more interested in selling me crypto than it does seem to be in providing s good browsing experience. Used it for like 2 months at the behest of a friend that worked there, didnt like it.

    • Bleys@lemmy.world
      321·
      3 days ago

      For me, a browser being a crypto shill is worse than just being a privacy concern. Crypto facilitates an absurd amount of scams, and is also awful for the environment.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    42·
    3 days ago

    Remember how Brendon Eich got booted off of Firefox for being a bigot, then created a browser to hawk crypto?

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    261·
    3 days ago

    On Android? They think that Firefox is a significant competitor on Android?

    This is like fighting another kid over a single chocolate chip while some guy is sitting on the other side of the room chowing down on an entire cookie cake. Ridiculous.

  • Aurix@lemmy.world
    22·
    3 days ago

    Low blow for a struggling competitor. I would endorse aggressive marketing against monopoly holders, but Firefox isn’t it.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    8·
    3 days ago

    “Brave Browser: Forget the Fox” absolutely reads like “Brave: Well, Fuck Those Other Guys, Right?”

    …come on, Brave, do it. Change the title to that. Or someone will eventually sue you for misleading advertisements. Because this is not very brave, is it?