• Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Damn right. Rich people have such an amazing work ethic. Look at Musk, he’s the CEO of 3 or 4 big company and he still find the time to tweet from multiple accounts several times a day, be an amazing father to a dozen children, rank as one of the top ten player in games that requires hundreds of hours of playtime, attend far-right rallies, kiss the potus’s ass and probably jerk to a picture of himself every day. Meanwhile I struggle to spend time with my family while only being a stupid little college teacher. We should all kill ourselves, we are not worthy.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Throw that idiot into the streets. Those who do not recognize the most basic compassion are not worthy of public office.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Will these assholes bring back everything, that has been commonly deemed bad for decades? They brought back Nazis, asbestos, led in drinking water, now child labour. What’s next? It’s even hard to think of something funny to write in the comment, because everything seems plausible.

    • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      What’s up with asbestos and lead in water?

      Its my understanding the Flint, MI situation is still a problem, but its my understanding its progressing (just at a snail’s pace). Has there been a regression in the situation?

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Guarantee you we blow more money on missiles for other countries to commit genocide with.

    Fuck these assholes and fuck everyone who votes for them.

  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sorry congressman, the kids couldn’t work at McDonald’s if they wanted to. At least around me it’s already fully staffed by boomers who missed the boat on retirement.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    One thing that I haven’t been able to work out is that Trump has pretty solid support from rural areas. That means that farmers are a political factor.

    But I’ve seen probably three different policies at least that look like they’ve got a lot of potential to be disadvantageous to agribusiness:

    • Trade wars. Okay, it might just be to benefit manufacturing workers, that that’s more critical, but typically starting spats results in restrictions being based on US agricultural exports in response, which is bad for American farmers.

    • This credit pause on federal loans. It looks like that’s been blocked already. Maybe it was political theater, done with the expectation of being blocked – I don’t have the familiarity to say how certain that was. But I suspect that farm loans would likely have been affected, as they aren’t individual aid.

    • Free school lunches and food stamps are basically a political deal struck to provide subsidies to agribusiness. My understanding from past reading is that subsidies to crop insurance used to be a more-important route, but that farmers lost enough political clout that they couldn’t get the subsidies alone.

    • Illegal immigration provides a lot of manual labor that’s important for farming.

    Now, okay. People don’t always vote for their personal financial advantage. I remember that in the UK, there was a good deal of discussion about farmers supporting Brexit, despite the fact that in general, Brexit was not expected to be a good idea for famers. And it didn’t work out well:

    https://www.fwi.co.uk/news/eu-referendum/analysis-7-years-after-brexit-farmers-count-the-cost

    Conducted in late May and early June, the survey attracted more than 900 responses, covering all sectors and including those who work on farms, as well as those from elsewhere in the industry.

    Asked whether they believed Brexit had had a positive or negative effect on the UK economy, the overriding sentiment was negative, with about three quarters of all respondents feeling that way.

    And asked about the state of their own businesses due to Brexit, a similar picture emerged, with 69% saying it had been either “fairly negative” or “very negative”.

    The British farm industry association NFU did oppose Brexit, and I’d expect them to take a position based on economic impact. It’s possible that individual farmers hadn’t familiarized themselves with the economic implications.

    This says that the Farm Bureau, a US industry association, is favorable towards Trump, though it does highlight some concerns (including the illegal immigrants issue and trade war risks):

    https://www.capitalpress.com/nation_world/despite-optimism-about-trump-some-policies-trouble-farm-bureau/article_5c781052-dc41-11ef-83cb-23c4d7a5d43a.html

    Beyond the expulsion of criminal immigrants, it’s still not clear what exactly the administration has planned for undocumented workers, Duvall said.

    At this point, the Farm Bureau has heard from growers about employees who are afraid to show up for work, but it hasn’t been notified of any actual immigration raids on farms, he said.

    The organization expects agriculture to have a seat at the table and advocate for immigration and labor reforms that won’t jeopardize U.S. food security, Duvall said.

    Increased tariffs on foreign imports could invite retaliatory measures that harm agriculture,

    So I don’t think that it’s just not running the numbers.

    • Naryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump doesn’t really care about support any more because he’s already won and likely won’t be able to run again.

      So supporting those who fell for his bullshit? Yeah not happening

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is what happens when you only vote for capitalists, guys. Of course they want to bring back child labor.

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the government forces them to go to school, then the government feeds them. That’s my opinion.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re freezing school lunch programs …… because they want to simplify it into one program giving all students free lunch, right? Right?

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nope. Work or starve. If you need handouts you’re a “useless eater”

      Child or not you need to “provide value” or you don’t belong in our new regime.

      He said it not me

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah then part of the reason for freezing school lunches is apparently to improve nutrition

        Does. Not. Compute.