The Lemmy Club
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Cat@ponder.cat to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前

'He's Building a Concentration Camp': Fears Grow as Images Emerge of Offshore Prison at Gitmo.

www.commondreams.org

external-link
message-square
40
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
428
external-link

'He's Building a Concentration Camp': Fears Grow as Images Emerge of Offshore Prison at Gitmo.

www.commondreams.org

Cat@ponder.cat to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前
message-square
40
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
'He's Building a Concentration Camp': Fears Grow as Images Emerge of Offshore Prison at Gitmo | Common Dreams
www.commondreams.org
external-link
"There's no reason to build this in Guantánamo unless you want to do things you don't think you could get away with on the U.S. mainland. It's easy to put tents in Florida. But they're putting them in Cuba. Ask yourself why."
  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 个月前

    Who else remembers past Presidents campaigning on closing Gitmo, then dropped the subject after getting elected?

    • MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      3 个月前

      Obama signed an executive order to close it, but Congress and the legal system slowed it down.

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 个月前

        Where is congress and the legal system now?

        • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          3 个月前

          Oh come on you know damn well where it’s at.

        • chase_what_matters@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 个月前

          in the shitter

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 个月前

          “They go low, we go high”

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 个月前

          Still there… proving, once again, that racism and the love of money is indeed embedded in America’s everything

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 个月前

        90 senators, including Bernie Sanders, rejected Obama’s 2009 funding proposal that would’ve closed the camp. And with good reason. Obama’s move would’ve simply moved the prison onshore while continuing the indefinite detention without trial, potentially legitimizing the practice further and providing a clearer legal precedent.

        Yes, he technically tried to “close Guantanamo Bay” but in a way that wouldn’t adress the actual reasons people want it closed.

        Sanders’ statement:

        “A number of important questions remain unanswered regarding the rather complicated issue of not just how you close down the facility, but what you do with the prisoners,” he said in part. “In order to answer these questions, President Obama has appointed a high-level committee of top administration officials who will be issuing a report in the coming months. I think that it is prudent to review that plan they develop before we spend $80 million in taxpayer money.”

      • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 个月前

        Only took him 7ish years to get around to it though. Probably something to have done sooner?

        https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/02/23/president-obamas-plan-close-Guantanamo-about-closing-chapter-history

        • Dashi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 个月前

          And what would have happened if he did it sooner? They would have kept stalling out out? I believe no matter when he did it out would have needed approval

          • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 个月前

            Then make them be the ones to block it from being shut down. Not try to do it right before leaving office.

            And maybe not sign the bill to upgrade it…

            https://www.courthousenews.com/obama-signs-bill-expanding-guantanamo/

            Plus not like he even closed it with his closing EO

            https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/obama-gitmo-plan-reaction-219696

            • Dashi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 个月前

              That first article quotes Obama trying to close it. From the sounds of it congress attached keeping the base open as a rider to another defense funding bill. That’s a common tactic I think

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 个月前

          He did start the process sooner:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13492

          This was issued in 2009. It’s obstructed (by the same institutions not obstructing Trump right now), and Obama slowly releases inmates over the next couple of years. What you’re linking to there is a “final” plan in 2016 to close it after the prison population of Gitmo had been reduced from 800 to 91.

          A final plan that never happened because Trump took office.

          • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 个月前

            So dems really haven’t learned anything since 2008???

            (from my other reply)

            Then make them be the ones to block it from being shut down. Not try to do it right before leaving office.

            And maybe not sign the bill to upgrade it…

            https://www.courthousenews.com/obama-signs-bill-expanding-guantanamo/

            Plus not like he even closed it with his closing EO

            https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/obama-gitmo-plan-reaction-219696

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 个月前

      Because it’s a very popular issue with the voting public but the voting public doesn’t have any recourse if you renege on your campaign promises.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 个月前

        Luigi begs to differ

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 个月前

          I appreciate the sentiment but Brian Thompson wasn’t an elected official, let alone POTUS.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.73K users / day
  • 7.86K users / week
  • 13.8K users / month
  • 28.8K users / 6 months
  • 43 local subscribers
  • 23.4K subscribers
  • 22K Posts
  • 607K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org