☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to sino@hexbear.netEnglish · 21 days agoNew Scientist: China dramatically cuts air pollution, but at what cost! 🤡www.newscientist.comexternal-linkmessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up190arrow-down1external-linkNew Scientist: China dramatically cuts air pollution, but at what cost! 🤡www.newscientist.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to sino@hexbear.netEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square28linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarevovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up53·21 days ago The analysis has yet to be peer-reviewed. I hate journalists
minus-squareiridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·20 days agoNews journalists are 99% bourgeois propagandists, and pop science journalists are by their very nature 100% middlemen that leave you miseducated.
minus-squareSpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·20 days agoSecond best is “we talked to a professional, then disregarded everything they said and just used their credentials to talk about UFO’s or scary bugs.”
minus-squarecontext [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·20 days agoit’s a preprint, the full analysis is here for anyone to review: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6005409/v1
minus-squareClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·20 days agoanybody got a degree in atmospheric science?
minus-squarecontext [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·20 days agonice try, fed ;)
minus-squareClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·20 days ago foiled again
minus-squareKuroXppi [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·20 days agoYeah about three degrees too hot
I hate journalists
News journalists are 99% bourgeois propagandists, and pop science journalists are by their very nature 100% middlemen that leave you miseducated.
Second best is “we talked to a professional, then disregarded everything they said and just used their credentials to talk about UFO’s or scary bugs.”
it’s a preprint, the full analysis is here for anyone to review:
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6005409/v1
anybody got a degree in atmospheric science?
nice try, fed
;)
Yeah about three degrees too hot
Yeah wtf