photo of Slate Truck The Slate Truck is an electric two-seater with 150 miles of range and no stereo. | Image: Slate Auto

Ask just about anybody, and they’ll tell you that new cars are too expensive. In the wake of tariffs shaking the auto industry and with the Trump administration pledging to kill the federal EV incentive, that situation isn’t looking to get better soon, especially for anyone wanting something battery-powered. Changing that overly spendy status quo is going to take something radical, and it’s hard to get more radical than what Slate Auto has planned.

Meet the Slate Truck, a sub-$20,000 (after federal incentives) electric vehicle that enters production next year. It only seats two yet has a bed big enough to hold a sheet of plywood. It only does 150 miles on a charge, only comes in gray, and the only way to listen to music while driving is if you bring along your phone and a Bluetooth speaker. It is the bare minimum of what a modern car can be, and yet it’s taken three years of development to get to this point.

But this is more than bargain-basement motoring. Slate is presenting its truck as minimalist design with DIY purpose, an attempt to not just go cheap but to create a new category of vehicle with a huge focus on personalization. That design also enables a low-cost approach to …

Read the full story at The Verge.


From The Verge via this RSS feed

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is there at least space to add a stereo and speakers or will I have to pull out the saws?

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Honestly, this is probably the EV truck I am looking for.

    I don’t live on a farm anymore but I still like to haul manure and mulch every year for my backyard garden, I need to haul wood for my wood working projects, and I don’t feel like paying 80K for a POS suburban penis enhancer that can’t haul shit.

    I can deal with no stereo but damn that’s sparse even for me.

    • Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not saying you’re not sensible. This is a genuine question. The number of trucks I saw when I visited the US (twice) was insane. Wouldn’t a trailer fulfill the same needs at a much lower price while being much more flexible in day to day use?

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not really, no. When one or two of the legs of your daily commute requires bulk cargo handling, the added issue of “hitch up the trailer. Wait, where is the trailer? Okay, drive there, hitch it up, pull it here, then we’ll go there. Maybe get gas before you get the trailer because it’s a pain in the ass to do the gas station with a trailer hitched.” Yeah no.

    • bunnyBoy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I want a Kei truck so bad. Problem is I don’t really need a truck for anything, so I’m not gonna buy one just to drive around in, I just think they’re neat.

  • dumples@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love this idea. It seems like it was designed for function and use over flash. If I needed something for occasional hauling and work on a property I would get this. I also see it as a “work truck” that businesses buy in bulk to keep the costs down. I would add in a radio and I love the lack of touchscreen

  • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I get cutting the infotainment crap, but not even am AM/FM radio with a couple of speakers? That would barely add anything to the cost.

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The article is rubbish. It has a stereo, different colours and aircon as well. Theres also a 5 passenger wagon model.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I am pretty sure there is a law requiring radios for emergency purposes.

      Maybe they got an exemption?

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m pretty sure all of those types of laws are going away and don’t matter in Trumpistan.

    • GorGor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I actually think it’s better to go all in and eliminate it completely. More aftermarket options.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        If they included mounting and made it easy to mount your own speakers sure.

    • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Basically everyone has a bluetooth speaker and phone to go with it already.

      I would much rather use that than am/fm radio tbh

      • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Speak for yourself. I don’t have a portable speaker because I have no need for one. I’d prefer a Bluetooth system in the vehicle, but at least something to have some tunes while driving would be easy to include.

        • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think the truck is setup you can buy and I stall your own.

          Which I like cuz then I’m not tightly coupled to whatever shitty infotainment system the manufacturer baked in

          Instead I can buy an aftermarket stereo if I desire, and pick out a good popular one that is well reviewed by enthusiasts.

  • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Further investigation shows Bezos to be backing the company. While it isn’t Musk and he isn’t in charge, I’m leery of this billionaire association.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You need someone with deep pockets to get a production line up and running. If not a tech titan it would just be a billionaire banker.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve seen compact pickups with 8 foot beds. That doesn’t look like an 8 foot bed. I’m strongly doubting that’s what the thing is going to look like.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        hahaha okay yeah that’s adorable but they do realize toddlers aren’t allowed to buy road legal vehicles, right? Are they going to make one for adults?

    • Homescool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t remember reading an 8-ft bed. I only remember reading that it could haul a sheet of plywood.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It only seats two yet has a bed big enough to hold a sheet of plywood.

        That phraseology heavily implies 4 feet between the wheel wells and 8 feet between the bulkhead and tailgate, the definition of a “full size” truck bed.

        My S10 is not that large in either direction; the wheel wells are about 6 inches narrower and the bed is 6 feet long. I’ve hauled a bunch of plywood in it… awkwardly resting against the bulkhead, balanced on the wheel wells and tailgate, with about a foot and a half sticking out past the bumper. Can my S10’s bed “hold” a sheet of plywood?

        Hell, even in a truck that’s got narrow hips, embrace the tiny and put a lip/shelf around the perimeter that supports plywood sheets from the edges so they sit flat above the wheel wells. You’d have room for studs underneath on the floor. Just make the box long enough to close the fucking tailgate.

  • Panamalt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is a very good reason we have tried to put basically every type of audio system in a car at least once. Driving in silence all the time fuckin sucks donkey balls, and bring-your-own phone/ speaker is a garbage solution, even for a truck that’s barely more than a harbor freight special.

    Otherwise, this is a pretty sick idea, and it might help solve some of the other more important problems the automotive industry has been having.

    • TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’ve installed a very good audio system in my car for $200, there’s no way an extra $500 or so on top of the $20k was breaking the bank for consumers or the company. Really weird concession to make.

      • Panamalt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honestly, $20k for something this barebones is reaaallly pushing it. The more I think about it, the more it feels like an $80 remaster of a 35 year old game with half the dlc missing. Maybe for $12-15k and a basic am/fm, and I’d be less irked.

          • Panamalt@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Doesn’t that just mean the already rich assholes win?

            You should pay for what your actually getting. If the vehicle has fewer features and less complexity, then it is necessarily cheaper and easier to produce (Both in mechanical and human labour.), and therefore the final product should also cost less for the consumer. Any dollar amount above that is used to improve the product in some way. Or, much more likely in this case, considering Bozo’s involvement, is used to line the bloated pockets of executive clowns with more imaginary money than any human being can ever possibly conceive of spending ethically.

            • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Those “features” are subsidize by selling your information and mass production. A low production vehicle will be expensive anyway.

            • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              They are talking about the features that track you, listen to you, monitor any data passed through their device inputs, and things like chips that allow for the remote stopping of the car, the heaters in your seats, your remote starter, etc.

                • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  If I had the option, and i don’t, I am going to have to spend my personal time resources, as-well-as money resources, on getting rid of it, if possible. The argument that the increased complexity, means increased resources to manufacture, doesn’t work when the added complexity turns the customer into a source of revenue generation.

                  The real way is to get legislation that makes this illegal. That will not happen though, so the equivalent of “ad free” versions of TVs, Cars, Phones, etc. would be a nice option.

        • PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          I had the same primary objection lol, you can leave the thing with a very minimal radio + speakers and thereby leave room for the buyer to add stuff themselves. But including zero inbuilt stereo at all just makes for a big project to have a normal-feeling ride. Solid yes from me until that, and then a definite no.

      • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why can’t techbros just be normal? WHY YOU MUST DISRUPT EVERY TIME JUST BE NORMAL!!1

        This is why China is winning.

  • CPMSP@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If they can scale this, it could be revolutionary. A perfect commuter and utility vehicle at a low price could capture a ton of share.

    The addition of customization options and intention to have customers wrap their vehicle is utterly brilliant as well - I will be looking forward to hearing more!

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wow it uses crank powered windows in this day and age. The only real concern (besides the missing stereo) is if it spies on its owners like pretty much all other car manufacturers.

    • andrewth09@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      If there is spy/telemetry nonsense, I cannot see why it cannot be wrenched out of the car.

      Most people don’t remove their telemetry devices from their cars because they would lose functionality. This car has no functionality to lose.

      If the telemetry is integrated with the car’s main controller, I’m optimistic someone can crack it.

      I wonder if I can run Doom.

    • Phunter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Manual windows with cranks? Do you also have to hold the door handle up when you close it so it stays locked?

        • Hubi@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You could lock cars that way before electric door locks became standard. You just push down the door pin while you hold the handle open and close the door. When you let go of it, it will stay locked. Kind of a lazy alternative to using the key.

  • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    My 150 mile EV wagon already handles what I throw at it, but I’d kill for something a little more truck like without breaking the fuckin bank

    This… This is high on the list now

  • irish_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have always wanted a truck to take care of the DIY stuff and the lawn stuff. I have never like the giant ass trucks that are overkill for my use or a status symbol.

    This seems like the right pick for me. Or else I need to get an old used one that I can’t be sure will last. Looking forward to what comes of this.

  • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    if Trump is pledging to kill the federal EV incentive and this truck is an answer to it then the article should provide the price without incentives. But even if it’s just under $20,000 with incentives, I still feel like it’s unfortunately paying more for less at the moment. Although if there’s tariffs, it might actually be cheaper than literally anything else you could get so in that situation, why not?