An AI avatar made to look and sound like the likeness of a man who was killed in a road rage incident addressed the court and the man who killed him: “To Gabriel Horcasitas, the man who shot me, it is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances,” the AI avatar of Christopher Pelkey said. “In another life we probably could have been friends. I believe in forgiveness and a God who forgives. I still do.”

It was the first time the AI avatar of a victim—in this case, a dead man—has ever addressed a court, and it raises many questions about the use of this type of technology in future court proceedings.

The avatar was made by Pelkey’s sister, Stacey Wales. Wales tells 404 Media that her husband, Pelkey’s brother-in-law, recoiled when she told him about the idea. “He told me, ‘Stacey, you’re asking a lot.’”

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The fuckin’ dude’s wife wrote the speech the AI read… I don’t care how much you know someone, putting words in their mouths like that feels wrong. And the fucking judge added a year to the sentence citing the power of the video.

      Fucking absurd.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I thought it was his sister who wrote the speech the AI read, but yeah, this whole thing feels wrong and gross.

      • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, this is super fucked up. I think that it would be powerful and completely reasonable to have the AI read actual words he wrote, like from old text messages, emails, or whatever. That is a legitimate way to bring someone to life—completely ethical if they wrote the material. This is a disgrace to justice and ridiculous.