• [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It really depends on the area and execution. Though this has been abused heavily by money-hungry police departments, if they solely set their sights on stopping the pieces of shit who weave wildly between cars while going 40+ kph faster than the flow of traffic, which is going 30+ kph faster than the speed limit, I’d welcome the stealthy police presence.

    I’d like to go a week without nearly being run off the road by some fucker with a death wish, but the police have decided their priorities.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Recent 2hr drive in California: five or six cars were an order of magnitude more dangerous than any of the other thousands of vehicles. Incredible.

      Speeding? Okay yeah people are gonna speed.

      Racing at 90MPH for a quarter mile in the right lane to cut off a truck and get one car ahead, then tailgating until you can cut another big rig off? That has to be the cause of a decent number of crashes we see on the shoulder.

      I’d try leaving speeders alone a while if it meant catching more of the tailgate->cut off->speed->tailgate->cut off drivers. (I know this is all been studied, just complaining)

      • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        See, I don’t even understand tailgating. How’re you supposed to see far enough ahead to cut off the next person if your view is exclusively the trunk of an over-tall SUV? It’s just poorly thought out from beginning to end.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        We still need both. Even the safest design of a road could still let someone drive recklessly and dangerously.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          If the roads were designed with traffic calming in mind you wouldn’t need stealth vehicles to enforce the law. The law would be intuitive and you would feel unsafe breaking it regardless of police presence, meaning there would be a lot more things on your mind than looking out for obvious police vehicles. A clearly marked vehicle would do the job.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            People feel unsafe doing double the limit on a highway. The unsafe feeling is thrilling for some.

            • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              That just proves my point that they aren’t on the lookout for cops and the stealth vehicles aren’t solving any real problem.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I propose a new law where in order for a speeding ticket to stick, the cop has to document that the violation happened within proximity of another driver. That other driver can be the cop when they are traveling along the roadway, but not when they are hidden and nobody is around.

      We would never actually do it, both because it’s still dangerous to speed on your own and because money.

      But I figure that there are so many cases of speeding every day that the cops won’t even be aware of 1% of violations. Why not focus on the most dangerous ones?