• Dasus@lemmy.world
    224·
    1 day ago

    Circumcision is genital mutilation, just as a reminder.

    It’s involuntary elective surgery performed on babies which can’t give consent.

    And no, I don’t need to hear about how “you’ve never noticed a difference” from people who’ve had a circumcision as a baby. The fact is a non-significant amount of those elective and cosmetic surgeries lead to complications. Some to horrific ones.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        27·
        1 day ago

        I mean, clearly it doesn’t. This one is faulty. It probably won’t work like it’s supposed to. Same could be said for some (botched and) circumcised dicks. However if you do have a functioning foreskin, then it’s just there to protect literally the most sensitive part of your anatomy.

        Because without it it’ll keratinize and lose some, if not all, sensation.

        Edit guys I’m talking about this fork, not your dicks. This is more a phimosis dick than a regular one or a circumcised one. I am not saying “circumcised dicks don’t work”. I’m saying some circumcision are botched and end up with loss of sexual function. I do wonder whether most causes some loss of sensitivity, but it’s very clear that Jewish and American dicks are still completely functional, even if a bit “balder”. So I guess I was wrong about the foreskin covering the most sensitive part of the male anatomy, or maybe it’s because they’ve lost sensation, but it seems like the most sensitive part of the (circumcised) man’s anatomy is the ego