An actual argument I recently saw:

Person B: “Any site which contains slurs against trans people in its sign up process is unreliable” (was referring to k!wifarms)

Person A: “Slurs aren’t considered bad in most countries”

Person B: “That doesn’t justify their usage. For example, conversion therapy isn’t considered bad or banned in most countries, that doesn’t mean conversion therapy is justified or good.”

Person A: “What are you talking about? Conversion therapy is banned in most countries”

Person B: “Shows a diagram showing that conversion therapy is only banned in a handful of countries”

Person A: “I mean in most civilized countries”

I’ve seen lots of other people refer to countries as civilized or uncivilized in similar contexts. Is this generally considered to be racist?

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    You can look this up easily. But the physical features of the Jewish population where well known and used in nazi-propaganda.

    Wikipedia:

    Jewish people, are an ethnoreligious group

    An ethnoreligious group is a group of people with a common religion and ethnic background

    An ethnicity or ethnic group is a group of people with shared attributes. … It is also used interchangeably with race.[7]

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Race is an American concept that is generally considered unscientific in Europe

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It is unscientific, but let’s not pretend we here in Europe don’t sometimes do it anyway. Racism is still a thing in Europe, unfortunately. But also, it has been a thing in Europe for basically as long as humans have lived on a large enough scale to notice it. In the 19th century you had the “three great races” of “Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid”. Even way back in the time of the Roman Empire they were being weird about race, ascribing strength and aggression to the pale people to their north and intelligence and peacefulness to the darker people to their south and east.

          We’re collectively getting a lot better about not doing it these days, but we’ve got to recognise that there’s still progress needing made

        • zout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Ok, than now all we have to do is decide who’s civilized, Europe or America, and then we know which is right.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 hours ago

            If we take the ancient Greek example of calling anyone whose language you can’t understand a barbarian, the US and UK are probably tied for peak civilisation

          • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            all we have to do is decide who’s civilized

            Now that’s easy:

            The ones who currently try so hard to destroy the planet.

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Europe is not a monolith, though - Putin’s Russia will happily watch the planet go up in flames. So it’s clearly “both”.