• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 天前

    I have a deep hatred for modern designs. Especially Material and Adwaita. There’s SO. FUCKING. MUCH. WASTED. SPACE. Early 2000s Winamp on my 1024x768 monitor had more concise and legible information than Tidal and Spotify do on 1440p fullscreen. It legitimately pisses me off.

    • levzzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 天前

      fucking YES! just give me information dense uis please!!! The new intellij ui sucks and windows 11 too, for this reason

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 天前

      I think most people, including me, appreciate how it looks cleaner though. On Android I get you, they should allow custom themes, but for Linux you can easily swap to a more information dense one.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 天前

        The problem with “cleanness” is that individual elements of a data structure more complex than a tiered list blend together without visual separation. It very quickly becomes illegible.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 天前

        Well, you can switch to non-GTK applications but beyond that you can’t really get more information density into apps that follow the Adwaita design language. You can’t even really theme them.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 天前

      You’re not wrong, as it’s your personal subjective experience, which can’t be wrong.
      But the fact that it pisses you off implies that you don’t understand the reason behind it.
      We used to have information-dense UIs before because:

      • devices used to have only large screens with lower resolution.
      • devices were used primarily be specialists for productivity.

      Which means programs had to fit a lot of stuff in very few pixels. Nowadays, vast majority of users are casual, the people of the land, fatfingering their tiny displays. They don’t need a ton of buttons and sliders. In fact, a common user would get overwhelmed by all that, even on the desktop. And while a small amount of people would benefit from a denser UI for the same casual apps, it’s usually not with the effort designing and implementing them.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 天前

        If that is the stated goal, then they have failed. Completely.

        My father, who is a “man of the land”, has issues navigating most apps that don’t implement a bespoke, application-oriented UI. Most of them use Material UI, and all of them have big controls, huge margins and padding, unnecessary rounded corners, actions hidden in unlabelled menus, stuff that you have to swipe at to navigate (without showing any hint of it), and so much wasted space that the entire screen is occupied by two or three rows of controls. I use some of the same apps and even I feel that the design is hostile.

        • letsgo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 天前

          Is he also into discipline, with a Bible in his hand and a beard on his chin?