• HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can see design evolution. It wouldn’t be too hard to describe C:S as Sim City 5.

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Same genre for sure, totally different game in how it functions. It’s like saying Quake is the same as Call of Duty because you shoot things.

        • HobbitFoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          C:S had a lot of similarities to the Sim City that was released as its contemporary.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Call of duty: first person shooter

        Doom 1993: first person shooter

        They are essentially the same game!

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        The big difference between any Sim City game and Cities Skylines is Cities Skylines has an extremely in-depth traffic simulation that actually punishes bad road design and encourages non-car modes of transit. Meanwhile Sim City always made nods to traffic, it never bothered with actual per person routing where you can focus on tweaking a single intersection for hours trying to get it to flow nicely

        • sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          One thing SimCity (except 2013) has is much better city management system. In C:S it feels almost trivial compared to SimCity.