• MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’ve never explained how property works, because even if stuff is free not everyone can get a French vineyard.

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He gets the vineyard because he can be bothered to run the vineyard. There are plenty of other planets with French weather if other people want to run a vineyard. Because it’s his childhood home and he’s saved the planet, no one’s going to strongly object to him getting that particular vineyard.

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Earth is still the biggest planet for humans and there are tons of people that would want to have that and live there. Other planets don’t have Starfleet academy and tons of headquarters and institutions that are only on earth. If you just keep everything status quo then you have massive amounts of hereditary white families sitting on the best properties in the world.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    copy/pasted from .ml:

    at first, i thought you crossposed this to the star trek instance and i was going to warn you that they’re reactionary and delight in banning leftists. lol

    the oniony layers of reactionaryism when it comes to star trek has been sadly fascinating to me: i lol’ed with conservative trekkies were lambasted by liberals for calling trek too woke because its newest iterations embraced lgbt and poc characters/stories and then i was just as stunned as those conservatives when those same liberals likewise ostracized leftists trekkies despite celebrating the leftist basis of star trek, like in the “fully automated gay space communism” meme.

    i wish i could understood how you can celebrate a popular leftist series; but reject leftists.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cognitive dissonance, that society is ideal but I don’t like anyone that would being about that society I just want to snap my fingers and end up in post scarcity utopia.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        well they didn’t do it through political reformation, they did it through fantasy tech. Socialism is quite easy when you have replicators that can make pretty much anything you could ever desire on the spot.

        • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They did do it through political reformation though. The replicators came ~200 years after getting rid of money.

          The show this clip is from is set in a time before they had the replicator tech, even.

          EDIT: It’s set before they perfected it, at least. They don’t refer to it as replicators but DIS and the other new prequel shows have fleshed out some of the precursor tech for the replicator in that time.