I always hear people/actors/directors say, this tape or film is x meters long, it is this size, etc. do they really still use physical film? If so why aren’t they using terabytes of storage in a way more compact form?

  • schmidtster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    So we have an electron scanner that scan higher resolution than limited resolution film… and we don’t need AI because the resolution is available if we were to scan it…? What…?

    Yeah that’s contradictory and exactly what you said…… sorry.

    You also said earlier something completely different about film not being insanely high quality….

    I can only interpret the words as you’ve stated them, and you’ve argued multiple conflating and contradictory points.

    So what is it? Limited quality? Higher quality than we could ever see? Can’t remaster forever? Can?

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m only addressing your first part and I’m done…

        Because you said you don’t need fucking Ai you clown. Jesus Christ, that’s the entire point of this now argument, you missed my entire point because you thought you needed to mansplain something, and have now caught yourself in a contradictory spiral.

        The other exchange we already solved everything else, there is absolutely usecases where my “hypothetical” situation already happens. Fucking hell