**Legislation may limit transport options for people who cannot drive and discourage those seeking relief from the fuel crisis **

For Maggie, 12, her modified ebike is her ticket to the world. The Rockhampton girl, who has a form of dwarfism, is unable to push a non-powered bike, walk long distances or carry around heavy books or shopping.

“It gives her the possibility of keeping up with her peers,” said her mother, Krysten Thompson adding Maggie may one day even use it to travel to school if bike paths improved.

But Andrea Herklots from EveryBody eBikes said she’s worried a proposed crackdown on e-mobility – including a requirement that riders be “medically fit to drive” a car – would lock many out of transport access.

The Brisbane shop produces modified e-vehicles for people with disabilities throughout Australia and in the US and Canada.

The fuck is wrong with voter electing these guys (as an ex Queenslander).

My anecdote, I came across a lady with an escooter down near the beach at Runaway Bay on the Gold Coast, she suffered epilepsy but hadn’t had any issues for many years. She said she couldn’t drive a car but the escoot was awesome (I was on mine and we got talking)… I guess fuck her as well ?

  • TarnFan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is no good reason to do this. Not everyone can drive, and some people just shouldn’t drive, even if they technically can.

    Less cars on the road is better for everyone.

    On top of that, Australia doesn’t want teens on social media but they want to take away their limited options for mobility? What are those teenagers supposed to do then? Drugs???

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Beyond stupid, straight up backsliding a useful, accessible mobility form to appear strict on teens. The law as it stood had anything powered at more than 25 km/h or greater than 500W power illegal (arguably already overly restrictive, I can see a case for 30-35 km/h). All that was needed was to enforce it, which was happening, if sporadically. But nooo, car brain go brrrr. Not to give them ideas, but analogue bikes are allowed on roads without license or medical check, what difference is a motor at that speed ?

    Rutting LibNats in QLD just can’t help fucking shit up since Jo, hopefully back to Siberia for the next decade yet again next election.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, but it’s this way in Australia and most (all?) of Europe where it came from. Nothing stopping you piling on the watts yourself to go faster, or downhill, but no power after 25.

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      We need to stop discriminating against teens. First Australia bans them from the internet, then bans then from getting around outside by themselves. The malicious intent is undenyable

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        But they can’t vote and persecuting them appeals to the LN core demographic of miserable bastards. /s-ish.

        Also look at the world we’re handing them, JFC, give 'em a break.

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s often used as an in for more invasive legislation in the futur.

            In the name of the kids and/or security, politicians implement the framework needed to further control the population and profit from it.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I see most of these attempts to limit/regulate e-bikes as another classic case of “let’s make it worse for everybody because a few people can’t behave”, but this is a new low, wow.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I was thinking more of your typical irresponsible users, anecdotal evidence I know, but most red light runners I see are e-bikers. Very easy to point at them as a “reasonable” basis for laws like that

    • ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      “I’m too wasted to use a pushbike so I should have an electric motorcycle” isn’t the strong argument you think it is.

      • theroff@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        What about riding distances further than one would be capable or willing to ride without a motor?

        Many people wouldn’t be interested in riding, say, 10-15km each direction especially in a hilly area, but a motor could be a game changer.

        The idea that you’re not tough enough if you don’t pushbike it is just ignorance and ironically more likely to push people into driving or other modes of transport.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      attempts to limit certain peoples mobility

      why would law makers want to limit certain peoples mobility ?

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Discrimination against young people. They can’t use social media either, nor can thru get around on am ebike. Make it make sense without coming to the obvious conclusion that society just hates them

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Young people also can’t drink, can’t drive, and are belong to the special class of “minors” according to the law. Is all of this discrimination against young people also ?

            • fizzle@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Why?

              Well thats my original question.

              The comment I replied to claims that its discrimination against young people, and i am asking why lawmakers would do that?

              The law in general identifies a range of things that young people should not be empowered to participate in.

              It could only be “discrimination” if there were no reason for the law other than to disadvantage those young people.

              The law is poorly considered, but its not discrimination.

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    “It’s going to restrict safe, legal ebiking in a way we think is pretty unfair and pretty dumb, at a time when we really should be encouraging everyone to get on a bike as a response to the fuel crisis,” he said.

    Basically this.

    The existing laws are inadequate and I do think they need to be overhauled.

    However, there seem to be multiple points of stupidity in this case.

  • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    E bikes should be regulated, those things are heavy and people fly down the bike path effortlessly, faster than I can when i really push myself on a regular bicycle

    but obviously anything a colonial government will do will be totally backwards and only end up harming people

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    To quote @supakaity in a conversation we just had “Thank fuck we’re getting out of here”

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve half heartedly been planning a move to Argentina for years now, but Argentina is currently not really a viable option. So as we’re getting closer to it being real rather than just vague plans, we started looking for other options. And Uruguay is a pretty good alternative. And it’s right next door to Argentina :)

            • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s fair, seems to be a pretty inclusive culture from the 10 minutes I researched it. Do you speak Spanish?

              • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                At about a B1 level. And I specifically speak that variety of Spanish (rioplatense)

                I’ve previously lived (short term) in Buenos Aires for a few months as well