- cross-posted to:
- demicrosoft@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- demicrosoft@programming.dev
You must log in or # to comment.
I miss BlackBerry
Why in the everliving fuck would NASA put ANYTHING Microsoft into a spacecraft?
Because Gates fucked Children with the President on Epstein’s Island…
The entire craft is built by giant US legacy corporations. Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, etc. Microsoft is just one more in the pile.
Your laptop is built by "legacy corporations, " but if you put Linux on it, it works better.
I’m going to sound super stupid but w/e.
What happens to all your files when you install Linux?
It’s just basically a GUI, right so does Linux create its own space and ignore what’s there?
Windows and Linux are like an operators in a warehouse. Windows knows some ways to store stuff and keep track of what is stores, Linux knows some ways too. Sometimes the way they store stuff overlaps, sometimes it doesn’t. If you put Linux into a warehouse that Windows operated, by default, Linux will be able to find boxes and stuff, but the Windows operator has some small tricks up their sleeve to make it harder to put things back at the right place, remove boxes, or add new ones, and of course Windows has kept it a secret.
If you want to find all your boxes in a Windows warehouse and continue using the warehouse without being afraid of squishing a small box with a big one because the piece of paper Windows uses has some secret handwriting that was misinterpreted for “there’s no box here”, it’s better to take out all the boxes, let Linux setup it’s storage system, and then put the boxes back in.
So backup and restore into Linux what I can.
All operating systems we tend to use have filesystems. A filesystem is a methodology for writing data in a way that the OS can read. Windows included.
When you install a new OS, such as linux, you must choose how to allocate your disk space. You can use the whole disk - which would format and rewrite the system to be compatible with the flavor of linux you chose - or you can reallocate space on the drive if you have enough. This will move around the available free space, create the filesystem I just mentioned on that free space you designated, and leave your old windows files intact.
You can now interact with these from the Linux side with the right commands (mounting the windows partition and gaining access). You could even “dual boot,” which would allow you to choose which OS you want to go to at startup.
I’ve HIGHLY simplified this since it’s just a quick explanation, but that’s the gist of it. There are obviously more scenarios, pitfalls, etc.
When I was first starting out in like 1996 or 1997, I was running FreeBSD 2.2.2. I accidentally wiped my system so many times that I stopped caring what got lost. It took me a while before I understood what the hell I was doing. Poring over man pages and instructions to figure it out.
It’s almost as if this bullshit project was just pork barrelling for overpriced contracts.
Bro. Moon travel isn’t bullshit. It’s necessary to save the planet. We need to go colonize outer orbit on massive colonies. Let the planet heal.
I sometimes wonder if the Microsoft haters are in a bubble or if people who remember just how fucked up Microsoft was are just starting to age out at this point. I would like to think that Anyone who follows security related news and current tech news are also aware just how shit Microsoft is (and always was), but again, I migjt be very biased lol
Me, and the rest of the member of the various unix enthusit groups I belong to, would never ever ever want anything to do with Microsoft unless we are forced to use it for some stupid reason.
For all we know, there might have been one person high up in the chain of command that is not aware just how fucking bad Microsoft is.
I have a feeling a lot of people will be asking NASA a lot of questions about it, now that there is a huge spotlight on it.
I have a foot on both sides of the fence. I work with MS products for a living, doing all sorts of stuff with AD - ask me specifics if you actually want to know - but I run Linux at home. Arch on my laptop, a variant on my NAS, a very scaled down one thing on a terminal, and I started my whole computer world on FreeBSD 2.2.2 back in 1997.
People in NASA who do real work know. They’re like everyone else. They just don’t have clout. So, if a C-level dipshit says “We’re using Outlook on the space ship,” that’s that.
Yes, I think we are on the same page on this one lol
They are going to space to seed the cloud
You would think that Microsoft would be like this is going to space. Let’s pull out all the stops. But no, it’s the same corporate crap!
It is a personal device
Personal devices running Outlook should be rapidly deorbited
And of all things, an email client?? What the fuck are they doing?
Porn.
Astronauts sending each other dickpics confirmed!
“NASA says they’ll remotely connect to the computer to see what the problem is.”
'Hello, this is your NASA certified Microsoft certied tech support, you need to send us gift cards to unblock your computer"
“WHY HAVE YOU REDEEM”
DOOOOO NOOOT REDEEEM!
Kitboga is the best
“The soul called Mr Barrister John Warosa” intensifies
Space Force TV show continues to fulfill the prophecy.
Shame that show was cancelled 🫠
Let this be a lesson about putting windows OS on space equipment.
Let this be a lesson about putting it anywhere.
If only there were low-bandwidth, straight-forward, well tested email clients…
low-bandwidth,
They’re on a 600Mbps connection, bandwidth isn’t the problem.
Bro what do you mean the moon mission has faster internet than me? 😭
They’re testing an optical communication system that will eventually give them 100+ Gbps (only 250ish Mbps for this mission)!
Probably also a different price range.
Why would you not use internal NASA programmed software? Oh wait, we’re beyond that now, we just ask Claude to vomit up a mess from its exabytes of source code and vibe our way to the Moon!!!
Is NASA using Claude? It makes me shudder to think that people are developing mission critical (literally, not that corpo bullshit) software using LLMs.
You would think that the absolute basic, minimum requirement for taking something on a space mission is that it complies with open standards.
If you have standards compliant programs, it’s easy to set up a back-up client in case the primary doesn’t work. If your email is “Outlook” and you are tied to the outlook server and something breaks, there’s your single point of failure. Sucks to be you.
What if the problem is server side
What if the problem is DNS
That’s impossible. They don’t even have that in space.
I looked it up and apparently: is it DNS
There I go getting the Narrator: It was treatment!
Why not? Friggin’ surrounded by internet satellites up there, their ping times must be in the minuses
Yeah I bet there is absolutely DNS in space, but that didn’t fit the joke, lol.
Mfw my addition to the bit was too camouflaged
Why not, aren’t they also handling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timekeeping_on_the_Moon
DNS would be the same logic. Maybe we should even have some higher levels than before. Name.country.moon.planet.star.
Haha yeah, I use outlook at work as a webpage in LibreWolf in Linux, so even with open stuff on my local hardware I can definitely still have outlook issues.
It’s easy to set up high-availability for servers running on the ground.
Easy?
And all problems are solved by high availability?
Imagine being literally off the planet and still be expected to check your work email.
I mean if you are on a work trip it is pretty standard
Gotta submit their timesheets.
Wednesday: 24 hours space travel
Thursday: 24 hours space travelAhh, gotta remember to submit the fuel receipts
Sorry boss, went a bit over on fuel costs this trip. If I need to chip in a few hundred million from my personal account, I can make it work.
Also known as “nominal outlook performance”
It seems you have problems with running your multi billion dollar rocket. Would you like me to help you with that?
100 billion dollar budget.
In space, no one can hear you call tech support.
Wtf do they need email for in space
The rare occasion when “It’s not rocket science!” means it’s harder.
