Found it interesting, something worth keeping an eye on. Hasn’t released yet, planned date end of 2026.

Based in Copenhagen, I think.

The founder did answer some questions on reddit (user ColeFromWalt)

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Give me a swipe for loyalty cards or the g wallet UI.

    I got curve to hit this need but the UI is janky and annoying.

  • emmanuel_car@k.fe.derate.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    No data harvesting, no Al, no crypto. Just a predictable wallet application that respects your privacy.

    God that’s refreshing to see.

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I understand they need that information to process payments, but whenever a company I have never heard of before asks for my credit card information it makes alarm bells go off in my mind

    How can I trust this unknown company with my credit card details?

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They say: “€10 a year sustains infrastructure and annual audits.”

      However, I don’t, at a glance, see any audits on their website. And yeah, I’m going to want one of those before I trust my CC info to some random startup (it says: “Your card details never leave your device.” But the software is seemingly proprietary, and without an audit, those words are empty.)

      • unglueclass23@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, will be waiting for published third party security audit results and compliance reports. About open-source he said :

        Correct! It’s not open source and at least for the foreseeable future, I’m planning on keeping it closed. Like JG mentioned, because of internal audit requirements that I’ll be going through in Visa and MC over the next few months, I need to ease that pain as much as possible. They treat open source finance products with increased scrutiny.

    • Babalugats@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t have to.

      As far as I can make out, by the time that they launch, they will have been audited and will have many other checks done, which should be enough for many.

      EU at least, has advertising regulations that should protect us enough to check out the app upon viewing any claims that they will have made by then.

      So by the time it comes to us actually being able to use the app, and assuming that they will have advertised and marketed it as a privacy focused alternative to Apple and Google pay, it should be trustworthy enough.

    • vogi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Their security page makes it seem like your information is fairly untouched. But yea would not trust anybody with that either if I don’t have access to the source code. (or other independent people that are smarter).

      I did actually went back to using my CC directly and not over Apple Pay to be less reliant mostly. But iirc one thing apps also do is providing an virtual card to the merchant obfuscating your real one. Not sure how much that’s worth in practice but it is kinda cool.

    • Flubo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I use graphene os and i pay with the app of my bank. They just included a tap to pay function a few month ago. Its Working perfectly. For all features of the app one has to install play services , but i can have Them deactivated and still pay.

    • oats@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m using curve for tap-to-pay on graphene. Not exactly a privacy revelation, but then its visa/mastercard anyways, so… Shrug

      • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I failed the initial Curve human verification and now I’m banned from making an account :(

        • Mika@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’ve denied my registration without providing a reason, and also played a fool when I asked to delete all my data. I’d say I dodged the bullet.

      • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am in Switzerland so no Curve here, but I probably wouldn’t wanna deal with them either way due to their terms.

        Luckily most stores here take Twint which is 100% Swiss and does work fine on Graphene. I mostly need an NFC solution for shopping in Germany and travelling.

  • Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Credit cards were a terrible mistake. digitizing money is a good idea but how did we go from cash (mostly anonymous and peer to peer) to credit cards (completely centralized, identity based, monetized for-profit platform)

    I hope one day to see governments make a jump to crypto and save us all from this shit (no, not btc or shitcoins)

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You lament the loss of anonymity (and presumably privacy) but then you wish for governments to adopt cryptocurrencies. That does not track.

      Crypto is neither anonymous nor private. Every transaction is written to a public ledger that anyone can see. You can easily track each transaction a crypto-wallet makes, and with a bit of effort it is usually not difficult to match a wallet with a person.

      Crypto is less private than the traditional banking system. At least with banks your transactions can only be reviewed internally.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        As far as I know, a blockchain solves a very specific kind of problem you never hear people lamenting about: trust. If you can’t trust your bank or the local shop, and those two can’t trust each other, let alone you, that’s when you need a blockchain. This tool is for situations where everyone is constantly worried about someone else screwing you over and running away with your money.

        If there is sufficient trust among all three parties, you don’t need a blockchain. It solves a problem you don’t have.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Crypto is neither anonymous nor private

        Monero is. It’s designed for that from the ground up. It’s the best use case for crypto imo.

        Unfortunately governments don’t like it so forced all the big exchanges to stop trading it.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think we’re better going back to cash.

        I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the high rates of inflation, especially on food and other groceries that don’t really seem to be reflected in headline rates, happened around the same time that we went cashless. It’s enabled people to ignore how the numbers went up,

        There’s something about handling over cash that makes you feel the price you’re paying.

      • Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        You are mistaken. Sure, bitcoin is like that, but there are alternatives.

        Monero is private and anonymous, and its not the only one.

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I must admit I am not exactly sure on the specifics of Monero.

          From a cursory Google it looks like they claim to be different from regular crypto-currencies on these fronts:

          • Stealth addresses for the recipient, so you can’t track who receives money
          • Ring signatures, so you can’t easily figure out who signed a transaction
          • Encrypted transactions, so people outside the ring cannot see the value being transferred.

          That leaves me with a few questions.

          Assuming that we can trust everyone in our “ring” ourselves, how does someone outside the ring verify that a person is good for the amount they are attempting to transfer? The reason why in regular crypto the sender, receiver and amount are public, is so that anyone can verify that noone is spending more than they have. That is necessary in lieu of a central authority verifying transactions.

          I take it that as outsiders we just have to assume that the “ring” is credible, and has verified the transaction for us.
          That leads me to my next question. How can we trust the ring? What is preventing a small group of people banding together and forming their own ring, approving each others fraudulent transactions? It seemingly lowers the bar for a 51% attack quite significantly.

          Any website I found also talks about stealth addresses for recipients, but how does the money then make it to the actual recipient? At some point the address of the actual recipient has to be made public in order for the funds to actually go where they are supposed to go.

          And if there are only stealth addresses for recipients, does that mean there are no stealth addresses for senders? Can anyone still see if I’m making transactions, just not how much and to whom?

          I’m currently at work, so admittedly I haven’t taken a particularly deep dive on the topic, but these are just some concerns that came to mind based on the information I found following a quick Google.

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Look up techniques like cryptographic range proofs and Zero-knowledge proofs. It’s all doable without trust, assuming you believe the algorithms are secure

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      how did we go from cash […] to credit cards Consumerism convenience, that’s all.

      If the vast majority of people saw value in cash (or privacy), there wouldn’t be as much adoption of cards (or the subject matter: phone payments)

  • ipp0@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems interesting! Does anyone have insight into how private this would be compared to Apple Pay?