• PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ll give it a year before this “voluntary” evaluation becomes mandatory, while standards based on industry-leading models, dictate guardrails impossible to implement for upcoming models. And thus giving reason to consider would-be competitors’ models a “national security risk”: evaluated by a board, which by then, is composed of “experts” with a vested interest in the leading industry…

    Personally I believe AI models, using content for which they do not have the creator’s explicit permission, have no right to exist (at least as a commercially available product).

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Objectively untrue. He lacks the cognition to realize anything of the sort. “Mythos is so scary!!1!1” is a PR line.

    • meejle@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if they want to vet the models to make sure they say nice things about Trump.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    AI safety testing under Trump is just another way to slow down competition for Musk’s xAI.

    Elon is a boss at paying off government to slow down any competition.