• Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 days ago

    “Are ready”? They’ve been doing that for years. Nike shoes are cut up before throwing away so people can’t salvage them. I’ve heard of some bakeries pouring chemicals over their leftovers to deter dumpster diving. If they can’t sell it, they will actively make it unusable so even the trash can’t be salvaged.

  • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 days ago

    Once I worked for Lowe’s. A home improvement warehouse.

    There was a line of top end fridges. Think like $1900 for each in 1998.

    Anyway. Word came down that our stock was discontinued and that we were to destroy them instead of sending them back.

    I watched the dock supervisor verify 3x with management both local and corp…

    And then run a carpet pole on a forklift through them one at a time and then toss them in the trash.

    Absolutely disgusting.

    Carpet pole

    • PineRune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      I worked for Home Depot for a while. Same thing there. Old stock gets discounted a few times, and if it doesn’t sell, it literally goes into their trash compactor (if it fits). When I first started, I spent an entire shift just breaking apart material to fit in the compactor. (That doesn’t happen often but usually it’s just smaller clearance items that don’t sell.)

      • YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Same. Worked in a warehouse. Getting ready for Christmas, we had like 5 pallets of last year’s 55in tvs i had to break. Boss said it’s way cheaper for that company to take the loss than bring them back to recycle parts or whatever.

        • mlg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I always thought this was insane when you could just give it to an auction house who deal with selling surplus by taking it off of your hands.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      And this was absolutely illegal unless they reclaimed the Freon first. You could have made bank reporting them. It is like 10k an infraction.

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah this is a serious EPA violation. The refrigerant lines run through the sides of the enclosure, so piercing the sides likely vented the refrigerant.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    The fact that this practice coexists with the practice of charging money for small packets of sauce really blows my mind. “I am going to squeeze every bit of penny out of you but only when it does not prevent food waste. Food waste is much more fun than earning money.”

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Nah, the English language is just on its way out unfortunately.

      At risk of being old man’d, I remember a time in reddit where shit grammar in a post title was a cardinal sin, and now it seems to be a requirement.

  • MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    Where I work, there are thousands of dollars worth of product that is designated to be disposed of every week. I donate everything that I can to non-profits, mostly Habitat for Humanity because they will come pick it up. Some stuff we’re not allowed to donate and we put it outside with our unsecured recycling - I let people know to go take it.

  • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    I worked at a high street clothing store in the 10’s and all of the clothes on the clearance rack past a certain amount of time was Ragged Out (slashed up with razors and discarded into a locked dumpster)

    They wouldn’t donate the clothes because it would hurt brand image if poor people were seen slobbing around in them.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is my Sat and Sun routine. Get to the grocery store at 8am because they have been open for an hour which gives the employees time to markdown expiring things. I go around the meat and dairy section and get meats and cream at 25-50% off.

      Unfortunately others have wised up and do the same, yesterday someone was a few minutes ahead and had a cart full of the discounted meats.

  • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Yeah because unsold inventory is a tax write off, where giving it away is more difficult and leave you liable.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      It actually doesn’t though. The law is very clear. It’s just bullshit corpoguzzling loser managers that make that up and say it to make them feel innocent while perpetuating evil.

      • JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I think food items may be dangerous and giving them away may still make you liable unless laws were specifically written to protect donations.
        Although there is some nuance here, the bakery throwing away the doughnuts and cinnamon scrolls at the end of the day is not the same risk factor as the supermarket throwing away chicken past its “used by” date.

        I see absolutely no reason why legislation couldnt be crafted to:

        1. Allow donations of food items without liability if sickness occours due to the age of the food.
        2. Allow companies to write off donations as stock loss (or whatever) so they can claim cost of the food (aquisition costs, not advertised sale price) as a tax deduction, which would incentivise donations as a win for both the donor and recipient.

        For non-perishables (clothes, toys, appliances, etc) then just #2 applies.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    They could just say “we have free food” and bunch of volunteer charity organizations would come over with trucks to get them btw.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Of course they are.

    Corporations always happily invest a billion dollars into wasting natural resources, polluting the environment, and destroying everything you love. As long as it makes them a billion and one dollars. Though even that isn’t always needed, and is sometimes more of a nice bonus.

    Absolutely batshit crazy that executives of companies like Shell, Tesla, or Nestle are not on death row.