The Great Pueblo Revolt, or Pueblo Revolt (1680–1696), was a 16-year period in the history of the American southwest when the Pueblo people overthrew the Spanish conquistadors and began to rebuild their communities. The events of that period have been viewed over the years as a failed attempt to permanently expel Europeans from the pueblos, a temporary setback to Spanish colonization, a glorious moment of independence for the Pueblo people of the American southwest, or part of a larger movement to purge the Pueblo world of foreign influence and return to traditional ways of life. It was no doubt a bit of all four.

The Spanish first entered the northern Rio Grande region in 1539 and its control was cemented in place by the 1599 siege of Acoma pueblo by Don Vicente de Zaldivar and a few score of soldier colonists from the expedition of Don Juan de Oñate. At Acoma’s Sky City, Oñate’s forces killed 800 people and captured 500 women and children and 80 men. After a “trial,” everyone over the age of 12 was enslaved; all men over 25 had a foot amputated. Roughly 80 years later, a combination of religious persecution and economic oppression led to a violent uprising in Santa Fe and other communities of what is today northern New Mexico. It was one of the few successful—if temporary—forceful stoppages of the Spanish colonial juggernaut in the New World.

Life Under the Spanish

As they had done in other parts of the Americas, the Spanish installed a combination of military and ecclesiastical leadership in New Mexico. The Spanish established missions of Franciscan friars in several pueblos to specifically break up the Indigenous religious and secular communities, stamp out religious practices and replace them with Christianity. Active efforts to convert the Pueblo people to Christianity involved destroying kivas and other structures, burning ceremonial paraphernalia in public plazas, and using accusations of witchcraft to imprison and execute traditional ceremonial leaders.

The government also established an encomienda system, allowing up to 35 leading Spanish colonists to collect tribute from the households of a particular pueblo. Hopi oral histories report that the reality of the Spanish rule included forced labor, the seduction of Hopi women, raiding of kivas and sacred ceremonies, harsh punishment for failing to attend mass, and several rounds of drought and famine.

Growing Unrest

While the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 was the event that (temporarily) removed the Spanish from the southwest, it was not the first attempt. The Pueblo people had offered resistance throughout the 80-year period following the conquest. Public conversions didn’t (always) lead to people giving up their traditions but rather drove the ceremonies underground. The Jemez (1623), Zuni (1639) and Taos (1639) communities each separately (and unsuccessfully) revolted. There also were multi-village revolts that took place in the 1650s and 1660s, but in each case, the planned revolts were discovered and the leaders executed.

The Pueblos were independent societies before Spanish rule, and fiercely so. What led to the successful revolt was the ability to overcome that independence and coalesce. Some scholars think it was a millenarian movement, and have pointed to a population collapse in the 1670s resulting from a devastating epidemic that killed off an estimated 80% of the Indigenous population, and it became clear that the Spanish were unable to explain or prevent epidemic diseases or calamitous droughts. In some respects, the battle was one of whose god was on whose side: both Pueblo and Spanish sides identified the mythical character of certain events, and both sides believed the events involved supernatural intervention.

Nonetheless, the suppression of Indigenous practices became particularly intense between 1660 and 1680, and one of the main reasons for the successful revolt appears to have occurred in 1675 when then-governor Juan Francisco de Trevino arrested 47 “sorcerers,” one of whom was Po’pay of San Juan Pueblo.

Leadership

Po’Pay (or Popé) was a Tewa religious leader, and he was to become a key leader and perhaps primary organizer of the rebellion. Po’Pay may have been key, but there were plenty of other leaders in the rebellion. Domingo Naranjo, a man of African and Indigeneous heritage, is often cited, and so are El Saca and El Chato of Taos, El Taque of San Juan, Francisco Tanjete of San Ildefonso, and Alonzo Catiti of Santo Domingo.

Under the rule of colonial New Mexico, the Spanish deployed ethnic categories ascribing “Pueblo” to lump linguistically and culturally diverse people into a single group, establishing dual and asymmetric social and economic relationships between the Spanish and Pueblo people. Po’pay and the other leaders appropriated this to mobilize the disparate and decimated villages against their colonizers.

August 10–19, 1680

After eight decades of living under foreign rule, Pueblo leaders fashioned a military alliance that transcended longstanding rivalries. For nine days, together they besieged the capital of Santa Fe and other pueblos. In this initial battle, over 400 Spanish military personnel and colonists and 21 Franciscan missionaries lost their lives: the number of Pueblo people who died is unknown. Governor Antonio de Otermin and his remaining colonists retreated in ignominy to El Paso del Norte (what is today Cuidad Juarez in Mexico).

Witnesses said that during the revolt and afterward, Po’Pay toured the pueblos, preaching a message of nativism and revivalism. He ordered the Pueblo people to break up and burn the images of Christ, the Virgin Mary, and other saints, to burn the temples, smash the bells, and separate from the wives the Christian church had given them.

Revitalization and Reconstruction

Between 1680 and 1692, despite the efforts of the Spanish to recapture the region, the Pueblo people rebuilt their kivas, revived their ceremonies and reconsecrated their shrines. People left their mission pueblos at Cochiti, Santo Domingo and Jemez and built new villages, such as Patokwa (established in 1860 and made up of Jemez, Apache/Navajos and Santo Domingo pueblo people), Kotyiti (1681, Cochiti, San Felipe and San Marcos pueblos), Boletsakwa (1680–1683, Jemez and Santo Domingo), Cerro Colorado (1689, Zia, Santa Ana, Santo Domingo) There were many others.

The architecture and settlement planning at these new villages was a new compact, dual-plaza form, a departure from the scattered layouts of mission villages. Liebmann and Pruecel have argued that this new format is what the builders considered a “traditional” village, based on clan moieties. Some potters worked on reviving traditional motifs on their glaze-ware ceramics, such as the doubled-headed key motif, which originated fro, 1400–1450.

New social identities were created, blurring the traditional linguistic-ethnic boundaries that defined Pueblo villages during the first eight decades of colonization. Inter-Pueblo trade and other ties between Pueblo people were established, such as new trade relationships between Jemez and Tewa people which became stronger during the revolt era than they had been in the 300 years before 1680.

Reconquest Attempts by the Spanish to reconquer the Rio Grande region began as early as 1681 when the former governor Otermin attempted to take back Santa Fe. Others included Pedro Romeros de Posada in 1688 and Domingo Jironza Petris de Cruzate in 1689—Cruzate’s reconquest was particularly bloody, his group destroyed Zia pueblo, killing hundreds of residents. But the uneasy coalition of independent pueblos wasn’t perfect: without a common enemy, the confederation broke into two factions: the Keres, Jemez, Taos and Pecos against the Tewa, Tanos, and Picuris.

The Spanish capitalized on the discord to make several reconquest attempts, and in August of 1692, the new governor of New Mexico Diego de Vargas, initiated his own reconquest, and this time was able to reach Santa Fe and on August 14 proclaimed the “Bloodless Reconquest of New Mexico.” A second abortive revolt occurred in 1696, but after it failed, the Spanish remained in power until 1821 when Mexico declared independence from Spain.

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo

The Tribal community known as “Tigua” established Ysleta del Sur in 1682. After leaving the homelands of Quarai Pueblo due to drought, the Tigua sought refuge at Isleta Pueblo and were later captured by the Spanish during the 1680 Pueblo Revolt and forced to walk south for over 400 miles. The Tigua settled and built the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and, soon after, the acequia (canal) system that sustained a thriving agricultural-based community.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE PUEBLO REVOLT }

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

Financial Support to the Bearsite

  • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago
    Why would anyone post this, big nsfw

    Through my travels I have discovered pron dot stream, described as “a letterboxd clone for porn”. It is basically what it says on the tin, you can read absolutely massive amounts of reviews from a wide variety of users, although the webmaster herself is by far the most active. There’s a lot of “x actor is really hot” type stuff, which y’know good on ya, but surprisingly even in this pretty-mainstream porn space, there’s a lot of people complaining of inadequate commitment to the bit in various scenes. They want the roleplay, and I gotta respect that. Also someone said that if lesbian porn features a tomboy, it makes incest kink feel more like incest, which I do not understand but do respect.

    I ended up disabling images with Ublock, not that I can’t handle gazing upon huge honkin’ badonkadonks and looking into people’s perfectly shaven assholes and stuff, but at some point I just wanted to browse reviews without that aspect. I consider the users of pron dot stream to be the real sickos in the ‘porn as an art form’ space; I’m kind of weak-willed and a hedonist when I do engage, because I only follow my nose to stuff that seems cool, and you won’t see me doing in-depth writeups on Bailey Jay scenes anytime soon. I’m not even strong enough to browse FictionMania, ffs.

    The site also holds a little more about the “pronouns unknown porno twink”, and I just find it really funny that there’s an idea that jorking it to a ‘plausibly-femboy’ (paraphrasing the actor’s self-description) would be considered somehow less gay than jorking it to a trans woman. We live in just the most amazing times.

    I do think it was nice enrichment, though. There is a whole community of both porn watchers and porn actors who truly give a shit about what’s out there and also enjoy the work a lot. I just think that’s neat, cool webzone.

  • Dort_Owl [they/them, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    All I want is to be creature. Why am I stuck in this flesh prison. If god was really cool he would let me be a shapeshifter. I’m pretty sure that’s a reasonable demand.

    I could turn into a crab and pinch butts when I get bored. What’s so wrong with that?

  • ClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why did no one inform me that trump has an honest to god ‘bring me a diet coke’ button on the ‘resolute desk’? and that Biden repurposed to its ‘original function’(summons a staffer, which you then have to tell to get a diet coke making the whole thing inefficient just like sleepy joe!), but then Trump reinstated to its intended coke function? for which he received a special commemorative diet coke bottle from the coke CEO

    I thought he’d just be shouting at the secret service guys in the next room but a dedicated button wowee

  • moh [it/its]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    prepping my aida fabric is taking a bit longer than anticipated so i might tire myself out before stitching cause at this point i still have to draw on the grids. i don’t like using hoops so i apply masking tape on the edge to keep the fabric from fraying as i hold it (i’ve never actually seen my aida fabric do this but it makes me feel like it’s more secure lol)

    was also thinking that i might do some swatches to make sure the colors will look right when stitched cause i’m a bit unsure if i like how some look atm. i don’t want to stitch it onto the actual project and find out i hate it or something. so i prepped an itty bitty piece for that too.

  • hello_hello [hy/hym]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    AI writing is so asinine once you pick up on it. Humans are so perceptive that we’ve studied narrative voice and tone for millennia so writing generated from LLMs is like stinkbombing a cat and you can’t focus on any of the content. catgirl-hiss

    I want to hear people’s messy stream of consciousness when talking about databases or their latest home networking exploits. All LLMs are trained on seems to be “profitable” types of speech where it sounds like the worlds most persistent telemarketer (“it’s not ass, it’s shit!”). I don’t give a shit if you used a LLM to make your website just make sure it’s interesting and don’t give me a marketing spiel on how claudeseek made you a man again or something bizarre if it were said out loud. negative

  • whatdoiputhere12 [any, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    for those that care (i don’t blame you if you do not) gta 6 got leaked once more, including a snippet of a cutscene

    i personally love watching rockstar and T2 eat shit, but i detest that the guy leaking is taking this opportunity to promote his shitcoin cringe