Its so bad michael-laugh

But also really, really funny, albeit unintentionally (pyramids go boom boom scene melted my sides). Also love the liberal shithousery of portraying napoleon as some sort of proto-Hitler or something, but apparently a couple of advisors and the director himself are anglo and some are ex-british military so can’t say im surprised. The politics of the era are barely touched upon too even though they were such an important aspect of Napoleon’s life like ???

it’s a really weird, aimless and incredibly bland movie, about a man who was certainly none of those things. I wasn’t expecting accuracy but at least a pretty spectacle, but instead got served a 2h long sleeping pill…

Wish I would’ve torrented this thing instead of wastkng money on a pricey cinema ticket (why has the cinema become so expensive what the fuck)

  • Utter_Karate [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I saw it a few days ago. It feels like a really long series of sketches/short films. There is like no coherent plot to the movie as a whole. They try to shoehorn in way too many historical characters/events, which is weird because they really do not care about historical accuracy. If you do not already know a lot about Napoleon it will be impossible to follow the plot. If you do know a lot about Napoleon you’ll just notice how the movie is wrong all the time.

    It’s pretty funny, sometimes even intentionally, but I can’t remember the last time I saw such a mess.

    Also: minus points for making Waterloo so boring. It didn’t have to be, regardless of the movie’s other faults, but it was.