• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 days ago

    I think pacing is of it’s time. Movies that seemed perfectly paced on release can seem slow now, as pacing has changed. So, to me, there is no such thing as perfect pacing as the movie may seem different in retrospect, which doesn’t take away from it.

    Look at purposeful slowing of the pace in anime scenes. Look at intentionally hyper fast pacing in thrillers like Taken. Both have more artistic merit than a well paced marvel movie that moves along but feels pedestrian.

    Playing with pacing can also make it fun, like memento or pulp fiction.

    I’d say, particularly well paced films are usually long epics like gladiator, braveheart, titanic, lord of the rings: as they need to be to carry the audience through a longer narrative. Or twisty thrillers that change course and weave, so you don’t stop to think too much and miss the magic, like sixth sense or silence of the lambs.

    Interesting question, though.

  • triptrapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Palm Springs is the perfect 90-minute comedy movie. Set up, punchline, move on. No time to stop for laughs. I’ve watched it 30 times.

  • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 days ago

    Dredd and Civil War.

    Both make it easy for themselves: keep it short, have a stated goal from the start, get to it, the end.

    For Dredd, they need to get to the top of the megabuilding and take out the gang leader, the end.

    For Civil War they need to go into the warzone to interview the President, the end.

    Love it.

    • madmantis24@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Going off of what was probably the biggest influence for Dredd, The Raid: Redemption

      It spends just enough time setting up the situation in a singular building, then the next thing you know Mad Dog is chewing the scenery for his big scene and it only builds up from there

  • iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 days ago

    Lock, Stock and two smoking barrels. It doesn’t have crazy action, but it doesn’t have a single boring or slow scene where nothing happens.

  • kalpol@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    The Crow is one. It is such a mix of great lines, bad acting, bad lines, and good acting but the pacing overall is pretty good.

    Hopefuly someone studies that film on why it works.

  • somnuz@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    someone else mentioned Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels (‘98) — but for me — almost anything from Guy Ritchie has great pacing, humour, some twists and little nods

    • Snatch (2000)
    • Rock’N’Rolla (‘08)
    • Sherlock Holmes (‘09 & ‘11)
    • The Man from U.N.C.L.E. (‘15)
    • The Gentlemen (‘19)
  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    The Hateful 8. I could see people thinking it’s too slow, but it’s perfect to me. Every single issue in Act I slowly boils to a head in Act III.

  • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    For me, it’s Le Samouraï, a noir thriller from the 60s. Most people would consider it slow, but I think it gives enough time for an audience to take in important details, think about what’s going on, and experience tension. It stands in stark contrast to many modern films where there’s always something happening.