• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Open browsing is letting anyone read what the site has.

    My suspicion on why, is because AI bots and crawlers can just read the contents of the posts and send it back to whoever prompted, thus “stealing” clicks that would otherwise go into reddit proper and generate ad money

    • Final Remix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yup. They have an exclusive deal with specific AI scrapers; don’t want to let other scrapers to keep getting the bot-infested shit for free.

      • NovaVeles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sooo… your saying Reddit is based because they are slowing model collapse?

        In case others do se the joke, yes that is a joke.

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      The article I read stated it more plainly.

      That 80% of their revenue comes from authenticated users, despite them being a fraction of their total traffic. So they think by making everyone log in, much more money.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you don’t show what your website has to offer to logged-out users, why would logged-out users ever start to become interested in it and thus becoming logged-in users?

        Commercialized social media was a mistake. It’s time for the public to figure out a real solution to how to fund online communication infrastructure; I don’t want a system where users pay for access (because that excludes poor people, most minors, etc.), but clearly making it funded by advertisers isn’t having desirable results either.

        I wonder if social media could be run by governments (similar to public television and radio broadcasting), or by ISPs (like they used to run Usenet servers). Federation could mean we don’t have to choose, we can have a mix of these and other concepts.

        • NovaVeles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m guessing they think it would be like Facebook where you need an account to see the bulk of it. But Facebook, Instagram has the whole “Talk to your friends and family” angle and Reddit doesn’t have that.

          They are trying to build a moat. Yes, it can keep people in but it also stops new folks from coming in. This might be the Digg moment of Reddit but then we have heard that many times over the years in the past. It is probably just a long slow bleed.

  • hal_baleigh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Same reason why every other social media site has done it, they want to to create an account and sell your data.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        But what stops then from making an account for the AI to login under? You mean to tell me those “are you human?” pages actually work?

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          They can then see how fast that account is injesting pages.
          If it’s inhumanly fast they can stop it.

  • ZeroGravitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    All of Reddit could be historically seen without a Reddit account. That’s about to change - you will need to login first just to see a post.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So if you’ve been permabanned, you won’t just be prohibited from posting, you won’t be able to read ANY Reddit content.

      That should make them fully irrelevant.