I find it extremely curious how it’s “both sides suck” when it’s Putin vs Prigozhinsky, but it’s “the Ukrainian state has a right to exist” when it’s Putin vs Zelensky. From a previous article where they interviewed one of the same anarchist orgs:

The defeat of Ukraine will bring about the triumph of the most reactionary forces in Russia—finalizing its transformation into a neo-Stalinist concentration camp, with unlimited power concentrated in the FSB [the Federal Security Service, successor to the KGB] and a totalitarian Orthodox imperial ideology. In occupied Ukraine, every sprout of civil society and political freedom will be destroyed and the very existence of Ukrainian culture will be called into question. On the other hand, if Russia is defeated, there will inevitably be a crisis for Putin’s power and a prospect of revolution. For anarchists, the choice between these alternatives seems clear.

So the Putin regime is bad for the transformation of Russia to “a neo-Stalinist concentration camp,” Prigozhinsky is bad for being some merc loudmouth who wants to raze Kiev to the ground, but the Zelensky regime is good for wanting to liquidate ethnic Russians living in the Donbas. But then again, crimethinc has always been sus for almost always toeing the Western line.

True that its better that Putin beats Wagner than the other way around. But what does “support” mean here beyond pointing out that lone fact? Russian anarchists and communists aren’t going to commit any material support for Putin and probably shouldn’t. So why confuse the public?