Latest consensus is that YouTube performance issues seem to be Adblock Plus' fault.

That would explain why I didn’t have any problems with Youtube and uBlock Origin.

    • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      43·
      11 months ago

      Anyone and Everyone with the slightest of computer knowledge but paid shills are plugging ublock origin everywhere and anywhere they can , and yet people still choose other garbages. You’d think that maybe they’ll see that tiny ‘sponsored’ text on top of the search result when looking for an adblock and go " why an adblock would advertise itself on search engines? this reeks of garbage, data siphoning bullshit adblock " but no, they even go as far as to defend it. I can’t even bother with these people anymore.

      • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
        21·
        11 months ago

        Adblock Plus was the only decent adblocker available for Internet Explorer 11 a couple of years ago. Only reason I used it.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          20·
          11 months ago

          I’m not sure you know what a couple is. Also, arguing with IE of all browsers is not going to make a strong case either.

          • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
            3·
            11 months ago

            Point at the case, because mine was an affirmation that it wasn’t good as I reluctantly used it.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        7·
        11 months ago

        I miss when people trusted nerds instead of corporations. Applies to a variety of fields.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      16·
      11 months ago

      I think part of the problem is that we refer to these as “ad blockers” so AdBlock is the first one people find when they look.

    • DJDarrenEnglish
      2·
      11 months ago

      No ublock for Safari, which, yeah, is Apple’s fault for being dicks, but it still sucks.

  • Newtra@pawb.social
    39·
    11 months ago

    The funny thing is that YouTube’s code is already so laggy that we all believed this without a second thought.

  • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
    12·
    11 months ago

    Just stay off YouTube for a fucking month. Or even a week. If the traffic plummets, then we win. Why’s it so hard to understand this?

    Hell, make it one day where nobody uses YouTube.

    • _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org
      5·
      11 months ago

      If the traffic plummets, YouTube wins. Serving content to ad-blocking users only costs them money. They don’t want those users.

    • pup_atlas@pawb.social
      1·
      11 months ago

      That would be a dream come true for Youtube. Think about how that would affect them financially, they would be serving significantly less load, but they would still rake in all those Youtube premium subscriptions. It would effectively be campaigning to remove the users who aren’t monetized from the platform.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    4·
    11 months ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    Turning off the ad blocker immediately improves loading performance, with the white line on YouTube’s progress bar showing significantly more buffering runway.

    Users report that the ad-block detection causes strange issues, like “lag” that makes full screen or comments not work or Chrome being unable to load other webpages while YouTube is open.

    The company previously has been showing pop-up messages saying ad blockers violate YouTube terms of service.

    But the slowdowns may be a big accident from ad blockers altering YouTube’s code: Adblock Plus has published a bug report covering “performance issues” introduced by version 3.22 and says things should be fixed in version 3.22.1. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill says the issue is limited to AdBlock Plus and its spinoffs and that blaming YouTube is “an incorrect diagnosis.”

    The straightforward thing would be to show more of these pop-ups and not send people on a wild goose chase after fake technical issues.

    This post was updated on January 15 at 4:20 pm ET with Adblock Plus’ bug report information and developer Raymond Hill’s statement.

    Saved 54% of original text.

    • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
      7·
      11 months ago

      If employing an adblocker is “altering YouTube’s code” then opening the wrapper on a Snicker’s bar is “altering Snicker’s product.” The code runs on my device, I get to say how and when and whyfor. It’s akin to receiving something in the mail… I now own that copy and can do with it what I wish pursuant to all relevant laws.