• TheDialectic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    He had an 1800s education and he lived in the first half of the 1900s. I am not sure by what metrics we consider him a modern person.

    Good info on the rest of it though

    • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      pre-modern is not exactly a relative term. Stalin lived firmly in the Late Modern Period, not early modern. When you say someone is a “pre-modern person” that indicates a specific time in historical periodization, one prior to the second industrial revolution. In terms of history Stalin is a modern figure. I don’t think we need to say Stalin wasn’t modern to defend his stance here. There is no exact science, but generally the contemporary period is post-WW2. Stalin is modern, but not contemporary.

      • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah and post-modernism is first said in 1949, which makes Stalin firmly modern. When talking about history we are dealing with a scale so vast that modern is a century ago.